Talk:Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury

Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 21, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

A fact from Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury (pictured) was hung in the Lord's Pavilion after Kent County Cricket Club were unable to afford the insurance?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury.

Wikipedia

Cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2006 sale price of painting

There's a bit of a disagreement on the actual sale price of the painting in 2006. FN2, the BBC "Auction feat" piece, clearly has the price as £680,000, as does FN11's "Market news". However, the other sources have it as £600,000, which is £80,000 lower. These include FN1 (which has the lower amount in its headline), FN3, FN7, and FN12. It would be a good idea to try to find another source, perhaps less contemporaneous, that might break this conflict. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 14:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, a mathematical error: 14/18*100% is 77.77777777...%, this rounds to 77.78%, not 77.77%.

A spot check found a little bit of close paraphrasing:

Source	Article
Tayler's painting was finished towards the end of the 1907 season, by which time 192 engravings had been pre-ordered - providing more than enough income to pay all the artist's fees before Kent had even taken delivery of the original.
Tayler finished the painting in 1907. By that time, 192 engravings of the painting had been pre-ordered, which ensured that Tayler's fees were covered.

That's a bit problematic, though it's borderline, not definitely across the line. Still, a copyedit to reduce that would help a lot. I should probably do a full source check, though, given that, but I'll wait until you give the all-clear. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: I've changed the wording and fixed the percentages. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some spot checks and failed to find any more close paraphrasing. I'm quite happy to promote this. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 11:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted.

There is a bit more information in the sources, by the way, so it might be good to expand this a bit more before FA. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 11:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]