This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
Comment Under what basis has this article been flagged with POV? You've added a tag but not followed the wikipedia guidelines by stating what the issue is. See NPOV dispute "If you add this template to an article in which there is no relevant discussion underway, you need at least to leave a note on the article's talk page describing what you consider unacceptable about the article. The note should address the troubling passages, elements, or phrases specifically enough to encourage constructive discussion that leads to resolution." If you don't follow through with the above I see no reason for the POV and it will be removed. Carmex (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can't speak for the person who placed the tag, but statements like "Kelly Richardson is one of the leading representatives" are not NPOV, especially since it is cited by a link to an art gallery that exhibited or exhibits her work and is therefore not a third-party. The language used in the "Career" section does need to be rewritten to be made neutral. freshacconci talktalk16:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, that whole first paragraph of the Career section is basically copypasted from the websites of two galleries representing her, so it's not only a copyright violation, it's not neutral or properly sourced. freshacconci talktalk16:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
