Talk:Keith C. Clarke

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 July 2020 by reviewer Lopifalko (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Response to comment as part of draft review

I have moved User:Elisabete A Silva's comment here that was mistakenly added to the actual article:

"Elisabete: hi DGG many thanks for this help, I already included a link in reference 3 to his wikipedia page and now I made it more clear in the page (H-index statistics tend to be dynamic, but I don't know how to create a 'live' link to e.g. a googlescholar page that upates numbers if the stats change, if you know how to make this and could let me know I would be very thankful).

I did some work some time ago on H-index accross subjects in my area and I found that they vary a lot depending if it is a very specific area or a more generic area, if its is more quantitative or if it is more qualitative.

For instance, in some areas of Urban Planning, Civil/Environmental Engineering, the more qualitative areas tend to have lower H-index while Quantitative areas tend to have higher H/index. Neverthless, if people are in a quantitative area with a very narrow scope they tend to have lower H-index too. In the Social Sciences and Humanities I realized some time ago that an H-index of 5 tends to grant Promotion across areas, but if people are in key quantiative areas, that number increases. To have a 30 H-index is to be a outstanding researcher. The gap between these numbers and a H-index of 60 as Prof. Ckarke has is a very big jump, that I would consider, only very few are stellar reserchers. To have a i10 index of 152 as Prof. Clarke has I would say it is 'stellar-stellar'. There are very few people in that group, and I would like to do the pages of those missing.

In this group, so far I didn't find one single woman that has a Wikipedia page, so far I only found men and they all deserve these Wikipedia articules, I saw a small reference to a female researcher that I keep citing but doesn't have a Wikipedia page (so I plan to do an article for her - she did the first article on CA during the 80s calling the attention for a new modelling approach) and I don't seem to see any references to two more women in Europe that were pivotal in urban computation spatial analysis/planning and two more women in the USA seem to be also missing. At that time this was mostly a men's world, but there was a group of women doing very good work too, so I plan to their articles.

I hope I understood your request and answered it. I hope this explanations help a bit more. Once you ok my changes I plan to delete this answrer as it doesn't make sense to have it in the page."