Talk:Kaufmann–Bucherer–Neumann experiments
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]I've written and expanded the articles on Alfred Bucherer and Walter Kaufmann (physicist). Those edits are based on the descriptions of Miller and Janssen. I think it's time to expand this main article as well. --D.H (talk) 16:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
You might note in both discussions that the increase in mass as an explantion of the unexpected decrease in the rate of increase of deflection could as easily be attributed to a change in the magnetic interaction, eg spin or charge polarization inside the beta electrons, with the mass unchanged. What do you think? Aesop111 (talk) 21:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Some extra references that might be interesting to chase up
[edit]They are quoted by Feyerabend in *Against Method.*
- “it seems very likely we will have to relinquish this idea altogether” Lorentz, *Theory of Electrons*, second edition, p. 213
- “Kaufmann demonstrates that Lorentz' deformable electron is ruled out by the measurements” Ehrenfest. *Phys. Zs., Vol. 7, 1906*, p. 302
- *Science and Method*, NY, 1960, Book III, Cahpter 2, section v: “principle of relativity...cannot have the fundamental importance one was inclined to ascribe to it.”
- St. Goldberg, “Poincare's Silence and Einstein’s Relativity”, *British Journal for the History of Sciene* Vol. 5 1970, pp. 73ff
- Einstein’s comments in *Jahrbucvh der Radioaktivität und Elektrizitaät*, Vol. 4 1907, where he regarded the results as “improbable because their basic assumption, from which the mass of the moving electron is deduced, are not suggested by theoretical systems which encompass wider complexes of phenomena.”
- The relation of this experiment to Michelson-Morely. R.S. Shankland, “Conversations with Einstein“, *Am. Journ. Phys.*, Vol. 31, 1963, pp. 47-57, esp p.51 and footnoes 19 and 34. Also “Conference on the Michelson-Morely Experiment”, *Astrophysical Journal*, Vol. 68, 1928, pp. 341ff.
— Edward Z. Yang(Talk) 16:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Updated
[edit]Now, I have expanded this article (originally written by User:Awolf002) and moved it, including the full version history, into the main Name-space. --D.H (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)