Talk:Kankana Banerjee

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, PopularOutcast, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on November 2018. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: general editing for notability and table needs to be changed to prose

Proper review please

Legacypac, I have reverted your rejection of this draft because I disagree with your reason. Despite Kankana banerjee having been deleted four times - in fact only two of the attempts were by the current editor - I think they should still be allowed to attempt another version. This draft is significantly different from the page I deleted and has been edited by more than one person. Please leave it until someone, not necessarily an admin, who reviews drafts regularly has looked at it and expressed an opinion. If such a person approves it, I will, on request, move it to mainspace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the most active AfC reviewer actually. She seems plausably notable and likely to survive an AfD discussion. The formating in the table should be fixed but I'm ok with mainspacing it based on your assessment that the page is significantly different then the ones deleted by discussion. Thanks User:RHaworth Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@RHaworth: I concur with Legacypac that this is ready for mainspace. Can you please unsalt the target so it can be accepted? Brad v 05:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]