Krypton (programming language) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 September 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into KL-ONE. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later.
Can someone put what the correct pronunciation of KL-ONE is? Is it 'Kay-Ell-Won' or 'clone' or something else? --Ferris3718:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Let's remember this is an encyclopedia, not a technical manual. I'm glad someone made this article, but I'm also looking forward to the English version.
This article currently leaves out one of the most critical, in fact I would say the defining, capability of KL-ONE which is automatic classification. Rather than describing the subsumption (class-subclass) relations explicitly one can describe properties of the classes and a special type of reasoner called classifier can infer the class hierarchy. Or it can take a given class hierarchy and validate or extend it -- actually in my experience that is the more useful way to use it and the way actual users prefer to use it. RedDog (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article is missing information about example of syntax. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page.
.jpg){kind=small}
