Talk:Julia Azari
Appearance
A fact from Julia Azari appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Julia Azari has shown that U.S. presidents increasingly defend their legitimacy by claiming to have a political mandate? Source: I will give two paywalled reliable sources, but to make things as easy as possible here is the book's blurb. For real WP:RS, see Horton, Gemma (23 February 2018). "Delivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate". Information, Communication & Society. 21 (12): 1836–1838. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1442490; Seyb, R.P (1 December 2014). "Azari, Julia R. Delivering the people's message: the changing politics of the presidential mandate. Cornell, 2014. 206p index afp ISBN 9780801452246 cloth, $39.95". CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries. 52 (4): 701.
- Reviewed: Exempt, but to support the process I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest Berry Webber
Created by Astrophobe (talk). Self-nominated at 06:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC).
- (Long time since I did this!) The hook is hooky and short enough. The article is new and adequately referenced. The source given supports the hook and random checks of the text showed that the article is referenced well. Thank you Astrophobe. GTG Victuallers (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Editor's note
[edit]Seeking consensus regarding recent changes by Leontrooper: the author of a newspaper article doesn't even choose the initial headline, letalone control the kind of editorial comments that might be made when a headline is rewritten. That part of the sentence isn't due weight in a biography of a living person, it's trivia about Washington Post editorial practices. I've modified the text to at least focus on the article subject. - Astrophobe (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I disagree. Usually when something in a (online) newspaper article is changed, a note is added to inform the reader. Even if the change is trivial or served to correct a factual error. That did not happen here. It's part of the news story Ms. Azari was caught up in. Leontrooper (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 150 articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 160 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Unknown-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- Wikipedia requested images of politics
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Women scientists articles
- Low-importance Women scientists articles
- Wikipedia requested images of women scientists
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- C-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles