This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article was accepted on 17 February 2012 by reviewer Bmusician (talk·contribs).
The article appears (self-)promotional and is not in keeping with Wikipedia guidelines. In particular, there appears to be a conflict of interest between the major contributing author and the subject of the article.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
A while back I saw both of these tags at the top of the article. My first thought is that the first one, autobiographical (or self-promotion), is pure speculation, not to mention potentially libelous. For that reason, I don't think it should even be here on the talk page unless someone can supply supporting evidence.
As for the second accusation, just looking at this article's history page, clicking on the use page of the person who created this article, then reading the talk page and examining the contribution history, makes it clear that this was a good-faith error. Enough years have elapsed that it should no longer be an issue.
Also, why are all these strange edits (putting in these tags) coming from two anonymous accounts in Finland? This looks like the work of an experienced Wikipedia user. Zyxwv99 (talk) 22:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The first tag is "autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject". The primary editor of the article is user Stargazer6290 who claims on their page [[1]] to be a student working for the subject of the article. This constitutes "someone connected to the subject" as per the Wikipedia tag. Aditionally, as far as could be ascertained, this user is an SPA. At the time the tag was originally added, this is therefore a valid assertion. It is not clear why one of the previous users on the talk page suggests it is libelous, unless this was directed at the claim made by Stargazer6290 to being a student of the subject.
With clear justification, and statement of conflict of interest, any neutrally written, non-promotional article of encyclopedic value has a place on Wikipedia. But as such, it is also subject to public questioning by anonymous review. That is part of the peer-review process, which is a foundation stone of modern scientific credibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.145.195.17 (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
