Talk:Jont

Author

• The author is a new user, User:LeePLesterno talk, no information, no obvious contributions elsewhere
• Has username that seems to tie in with record label contact at MySpace page

Enquiries

PR:sarah@wastedyouthpr.com

TV & Radio:kat@largepr.com

All other:lee@unlitrecords.com

-- billinghurst (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

• Although I do have an affiliation with the subject, I believe I am acting within the guideline "If you do write an article on an area in which you are personally involved, be sure to write in a neutral tone and cite reliable, third-party published sources, and beware of unintentional bias." from the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest page. To further ensure this I have removed a line or two which could be perceived as being in the interest of the subject and added more references. Hopefully this shows my commitment to producing a quality Wikipedia article and clears the issue up for you. Please let me know if you feel anything else needs to be done.

LeePLester (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

• Third party has made edits to article, and as this was an action requested to wait for by Billinghurst before removing the conflict of interest banner, am now doing so.

LeePLester (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I do not believe that this adequately covers this situation. You have a very specific vested interest. Your user page provides no detail that reflect your vested/conflicted interest in the person. Your only visible participation on Wikipedia is for a person in which you have an interest. No third party has

I have reinstated the {{COI}} as in my opinion, it is still relevant. If you think that I am being unfairly harsh, then you may wish to use one of the existing resolution processes within Wikipedia. -- billinghurst (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Jont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19960614/ai_n14042097
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090817222417/http://www.mescalina.it/musica/interviste-/interviste.php?id=18&l=en to http://www.mescalina.it/musica/interviste-/interviste.php?id=18&l=en
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/sunsetstrip/amphitheatre/3834/newscene_frame2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080916000620/http://www.i-am-everyone.co.uk/orangeunlit to http://www.i-am-everyone.co.uk/orangeunlit/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081007162456/http://www.jontnet.com/unlit.php to http://www.jontnet.com/unlit.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080916000620/http://www.i-am-everyone.co.uk/orangeunlit to http://www.i-am-everyone.co.uk/orangeunlit/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)