Talk:Johnny Peirson/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 22:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Shall review this article for the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive MWright96 (talk) 22:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead
[edit]- "serving in that role for over two decades." - more than
- Changed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Wikilink university hockey to College ice hockey
- Linked. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Boston Bruins doesn't need to be wikilinked twice in the lead
- Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Early life
[edit]- "After his stint in the military, Peirson was accepted into McGill University in 1945.[2] There, he played one season for the McGill Redmen." - maybe merge these two sentences together?
- Merged. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- "It turned out to be McGill's final Queen's Cup for over 60 years" - more than
- Changed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Wikilink the term points to Point (ice hockey)
- Linked.—Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Minor leagues
[edit]- "who was keen to earn a bit of extra money for his education" - text in bold is informal
- Didn't want to close paraphrase with "some money". Changed it to "some extra money" – hope that's alright. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- NHL should be spelt out in full on the first mention and the acronyms put in parentheses
- I already did that in the lead. Should it be done again in the main section? —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- I would advise that MWright96 (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Done. —Bloom6132 (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Boston Bruins (1947–1958)
[edit]- "His legs were described as having "sort of disappeared" - described by whom?
- Ref 4 (by McGill) quotes it as:
Peirson retired in 1958, because his "legs sort of disappeared."
It does not attribute the description to him. I Googled the exact quotation but this is the only source that mentions it. —Bloom6132 (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC) - @MWright96: I've reworded it to have the exact quote (i.e. removing "were described as having"). —Bloom6132 (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Ref 4 (by McGill) quotes it as:
Post-playing career
[edit]- "The pair would work together in that capacity for 18 years. They notably covered the first four games of the Summit Series for American viewers." - perhaps merge these two sentences together
- Done. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal life
[edit]- "Peirson married Barbara Ann (Hunt) around 1951. They remained married for 70 years until his death." - these two sentences could possibly be merged together and shortened accordingly
- Merged. Not sure if I shortened it enough – feel free to suggest a better wording. —Bloom6132 (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Career statstics
[edit]- "Source: [1][2][6]" - should be Sources
- Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
References
[edit]- Reference 8 should mention it comes from NewspaperArchives.com
- Done. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reference 13 is missing the page number stating the fact of Pierson's 1950 Canadian Open result
- Added. —Bloom6132 (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- @MWright96: thanks very much for the review! I hope I've addressed your comments satisfactorily. —Bloom6132 (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Bloom6132: Now promoting to GA class MWright96 (talk) 16:48, 6 July 2021 (UTC)