This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2017.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride
I contest the deletion given the article met the Notability (people) criteria given that John Hoyle has a primary role in many of Aphra Behn's writings, and aside from that, his trial for sodomy is part of LGBT History in the XVII century (People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisa.rolle (talk • contribs) 00:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover there was a wrong pointing from Aphra Behn to another John Hoyle, who is not the right Hoyle, and that is confusing for researchers. It's right to have the right page with the right John Hoyle in wikimedia--Elisa.rolle (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
valereee I'm not sure how much more it can be done. I removed the copyvio from the sentence of the Parliament, much of the rest of the article was touched by other users and it looks fine. I don't have access to other sources, so I suppose that's it. Please let me know it there is other I can do (read or change). Elisa.rolle (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
