Talk:John Hartley (academic)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Australia: Queensland / Western Australia / Perth / Education Low‑importance

	Australia portal John Hartley (academic) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Untitled

QUT link mentions "This person does not currently hold a position at QUT."

http://staff.qut.edu.au/staff/hartleyj/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floydwilde (talk • contribs) 08:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The PDF document which you can download here:

http://www.cci.edu.au/node/1349

Mentions:

"John Hartley AM, FAHA is Professor of Cultural Science and Director of the Centre for Culture and Technology (CCAT) at Curtin University in Western Australia." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floydwilde (talk • contribs) 09:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-structure required

Done

I think the article needs a more defined structure, perhaps. Much of the details should probably be listed in chronological order, eg:

Lead paragraph: current first sentence and most notable achievements (perhaps the first paragraph, as it currently stands)
Early life: born UK, Sir Roger Manwood's School, BA at Cardiff
Academic career: ... almost everything else in the current article, but put it in chronological order
Bibliography: ...

One problem is that some the current statements are don't have obvious time frames, eg "has made major research contributions to the study of popular culture ..." so it's not clear where they should fit in. Others (eg "He has held academic positions at Murdoch University, the Polytechnic of Wales, and Edith Cowan University") don't currently have dates, but presumably we could get them.

Does anyone have any thoughts suggestions about structuring the article? Mitch Ames (talk) 11:44, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on this now... Mitch Ames (talk) 13:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Mitch Ames (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References and details required for some potentially WP:PEACOCK claims

Some of the statements in the article appear about too promotional, eg "best-selling book", "pioneer and international leader", "has made major research contributions". We need to quantify and provide references for these, else they risk being deleted as WP:PEACOCK. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes, References

I've moved the inlined (numbered) and non-inlined (bulletted) references back into a single section, because the number ones are definitely reference, not explanatory footnotes. (See WP:FNNR) The intent is to add inline cites for everything. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page you linked is ambivalent on formatting footnotes and references. Hack (talk) 13:19, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FNNR says "General references and other full citations may similarly be ... combined " and "Editors may use any citation method they choose." which is a link to WP:CITEVAR which says "Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style ...it is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor ". For the purpose of determining the "established style" I suggest that these are the relevant edits: [1][2]. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

major research contributions

I've deleted the sentence "Hartley has made major research contributions ..." because it is vague and unreferenced. I've no doubt that he has made major research contributions, but we need:

more specific details
references

Mitch Ames (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on John Hartley (academic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]