This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
I've cut quite a lot of material out of this article recently - a lot of it seemed promotional, or very trivial, and the sourcing wasn't great. I'd have no problem with there being a section about 'Critical reception', if a noted food critic has written a review we could quote them, but just linking to the restaurant's website and saying there are press clippings there isn't good enough. We don't need a list of all the food that has ever been served there, and we certainly don't include pricing information (this is an encyclopedia, not a Time Out guide). The material in the 'controversies' section seemed reliable sourced, so I've reinstated it. I'm happy to discuss these changes with other editors. GirthSummit (blether)18:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your cuts were warranted, but now there are WP:WEIGHT and WP:NOTNEWS issues. This is nominally an encyclopedia article about a restaurant, but it is dominated by a "Controversies" that involves mostly personal foibles and peccadilloes of the restaurant's staff. — AjaxSmack01:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]