Talk:Jo Carrillo

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Catheh5796.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Hi Catheh5796, I received a notification of the page's nomination for deletion. When creating pages you must make sure that you add enough independent, reliable sources to show where the person (or topic) is notable enough for inclusion. Any uncited material, including whole articles, can be nominated for deletion and removed from Wikipedia - something regardless of what the claims are in the article.

I've added two sources to this article, reviews of Carrillo's work, however this article will still need more sourcing to really show how she's notable. It looks like there should be more sourcing on some of the academic databases, however I can't really access it on my end so it's up to you to find more sourcing. I think that what is in the article now would be enough to keep it from getting deleted by this specific BLP PROD (a proposed deletion for articles without any reliable sources) but if someone wanted to pursue a different sort of deletion the article would still be at risk. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]