This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Yes, you proposed that it was proof, and Robert McClenon agreed with you on this point. Nobody else commented on it, either way. Yet the article's deletion was "endorsed" (allowed to continue), even though the article was considerably more informative than this draft on Lerner is. (Interestingly, nobody has bothered since then to create a good article on Thompson, even though this was permitted.) If being a FAIA is evidence of notability, then Lerner is notable; if she's notable, then I'd expect that good material would have been written about her in reliable sources. Where is this? (Don't answer this here; instead, add summaries of such material to the draft.) -- Hoary (talk) 06:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's my dilemma. Sometimes the person (usually a scholar) is "notable" for a particular achievement (like a fellowship), but they do not have much details beyond that. At this point, I have done whatever I can to use "official" source not written by Lerner herself. I originally wrote this for an editathon. If this still does not qualify moving the draft to the article namespace, I do not have more mental energy to improve beyond this. Feel free to CSD G13 or U1 this. 痛 (talk) 14:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I have declined the draft because the statement that she is a Fellow of the American Institute of Architects is unreferenced. Either provide a reliable source for FAIA, or expand the draft to satisfy general notability, or both. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(Shrug) I don't know why you think source #6 "fellows directory" makes the statement "unreferenced", but I respect your time. 痛 (talk) 18:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No need to get a 頭痛 over this, 痛; just muster a little more "mental energy". I warmly disagree with Robert McClenon: The source already cited credibly demonstrates that Jill N. Lerner is a FAIA. But the AIA didn't just choose her by opening a phone directory and sticking a pin on a page while blindfold. You've got four buildings "Under Lerner's Direction", and three of the four are, we're told, written up somehow in a two-page span within The world by design: the story of a global architecture firm. Doesn't this say something about Lerner's work? (That she directed the design this way or that way; that the result is this kind of success or perhaps that kind of failure?) -- Hoary (talk) 00:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
