Talk:Jesuit missions in China
Jesuit artillery
[edit]http://books.google.com/books?id=RtsDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA108#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kuoofra (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
1606 conspiracy invasion involving the jesuits and portuguese
[edit]http://books.google.com/books?id=oQ8BFk9K0ToC&pg=PA437#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=zERymZzBQQYC&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false
In 1617, china suspects catholic missionaries of being portuguese and accuse them of spreading heretical doctrines
http://epress.nus.edu.sg/msl/entry/3254
Rajmaan (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Typo in First Sentence of "Dynastic Change" Section?
[edit]"While some Jesuit fathers managed to impress Manchu commanders with a display of western science of ecclesiastical finery and to be politely invited to join the new order . . ."
Shouldn't "of" be regarded as a typo for "or" in the sentence above? 204.57.79.78 (talk) 17:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jesuit China missions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615172744/http://ricci.rt.usfca.edu/bibliography/view.aspx?bibliographyID=1839 to http://ricci.rt.usfca.edu/bibliography/view.aspx?bibliographyID=1839
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 25 November 2017 (UTC)