Talk:Jessica Yaniv

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 August 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

It is requested that a photograph of Jessica Yaniv be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Canada may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Jyaniv (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (June 12, 2008 user Jyaniv created the 1st version of this article.)
Tn blogs (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (August 26, 2014 user Tn blogs created the 2nd version of this article.)
TechJournalistInfo (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (September 9, 2014 user TechJournalistInfo created the 3rd version of this article.)

On 7 November 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Jessica Simpson (activist). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

"Male" Genitalia

Referring to male-typical genitalia on a female as "male genitalia" seems intentionally transphobic. 47.196.237.32 (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. We should replace all instances of "male genitalia" with "her penis and scrotum." 98.118.115.80 (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It still says "her male genitalia." As a trans person, this really bothers me. Will wikipedia go on supporting this intentional transphobia? 98.118.115.80 (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Well, I believe we should stick to what the reliable sources are saying when it coming to talking about what is between a person's legs. If they use the term "male genitalia", then who are we to talk over them? SparklyNights 02:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How "reliable" can a source that refers to a woman's genitalia as "male" be? VeroniqueBellamy (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We had an RfC about this back in 2021, which ended in consensus to use "male genitalia". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "male genitalia" (and dead-naming) is 100% transphobic; as is other info provided; even editors comments appear transphobic. Dean Dudeist Priest (talk) 12:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to change the first line of these articles (Penis, Testicle) and see where that gets you. And ignoring that the references supplied use the term "male genitalia". 2001:BB6:2CC9:C000:380D:2B33:C685:518 (talk) 22:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New charges

02-Mar-2022 CC - 502(2) app: replace undertaking form 10 w/release order (1 count)

25-Feb-2022 CCC-266 Assault (1 count)

25-Feb-2022 CCC - 437 false alarm of fire (2 counts)

25-Feb-2022 CC - 140(1)(c) Reporting an offence committed when it was not (3 counts)

BC Judge J. Solomon has just handed down the latest ruling in a series of convictions for the self-proclaimed trans activist Jessica Serenity Simpson. Simpson, formerly Jonathan Yaniv, has been found guilty of public mischief for pulling a fire alarm for false purposes. The incident occurred last Spring after a dog that Simpson claims is her service dog became unruly in a common area of a retirement home, the residence of Simpson's elderly mother. After repeatedly asking for Simpson to remove the dog, a 70-year-old man named Gerald Funke, who is dependent on a walker, was met by a forceful push from Simpson after moving the dog from off of a chair. Another man intervened to stop the altercation. Simpson called 911 and falsely claimed to have been assaulted by Mr. Funke, which Judge Solomon today acknowledged as a lie. Simpson also pulled the fire alarm, which the defence attorney argued was done out of fear for Simpson’s life. While Judge Solomon agreed that Simpson pushed Mr. Funke away from the dog with harder force than was necessary, his ruling found that “the Crown has failed to prove the accused guilt beyond a reasonable doubt” and thus Simpson was not guilty of assault. Simpson has had three prior convictions, including being found guilty of assaulting my former colleague, Keean Bexte. The assault took place while he was covering a hearing discussing Simpson's brandishing of a prohibited weapon on the YouTube channel for political commentator Blair White. Jubez1 (talk) 04:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Defamation case

On July 12, 2022 Justice Warren Milman of the BC Supreme core dismissed a defamation launched by Jessica Simpson against Rebel News Network Ltd. Simpson launched the case in April 2021 and sought damages and relief from statements allegedly made by Rebel News which damaged her reputation and vilified her as a person. Justice Milman cited Simpsons tendency to engage in a public area as well as her extensive history of using legal processes or threats of legal action to silence criticism against her as being problematic, and while clouded at times the coverage by Rebel news was in fact in the interest of the public. The claims made by Simpson were weak, ^[1]^[2]

References

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.3.3.122 (talk) 03:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Racism

Do the "turban fu***er" or the N word incidents warrant mentioning in regards to her horrific racial remarks? https://nextshark.com/sikh-man-lgbt-advocate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:F780:8:3137:0:0:0:18 (talk) 05:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Court ruling: https://assets.nationbuilder.com/therebel/pages/60559/attachments/original/1658003786/Justice_Milman__re_Simpson_v._Rebel_News_Network_Ltd.__07-12.pdf?1658003786

[2] Media story of ruling: https://www.nsnews.com/highlights/bc-trans-activists-defamation-case-against-rebel-news-dismissed-5580308

[1]

[2]