Jump to content

Talk:Japanese settlement in Palau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJapanese settlement in Palau has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 17, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 1, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Japanese settlement in Palau dates back to the 19th century?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2023.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese settlement in Palau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 03:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Notes
  • 4 images, all tagged public domain and hosted at the Commons.
  • No problems that I can see. Meets the GA criteria. A good balanced article that meets all of Wikipedia's norms. maclean (talk) 04:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Japanese settlement in Palau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]