Talk:James White (inventor)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 02:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sohom Datta (talk · contribs) 14:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This has been around in the backlog long enough, I'll take a stab at this. Sohom (talk) 14:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Review
[edit]600 subscribers
-- I don't think subscribers is the right term here.- Source uses it but yeah it doesn't seem right. Used customers instead. -G
although it is unknown if White was aware of its separate invention by clockmakers, first attested by Joseph Williamson c. 1720.
-- This is a bit hard to parse, what does first attested by mean in the context?- Good point, rephrased a bit. - G
bolstered by cross-Channel transmission
-- cross-channel?possibly indicating his acquaintanceship
-- Why possibly?- Source sorta hedges its bets without fully committing. I think this is because he never actually mentioned the Earl Stanhope until later in life. - G
possibly indicating that his parents were Nonconformists.
-- Is this backed up by the source, feels like a bit of a stretch to assume this?- The source makes this claim directly; "No record [of his birth] is found in the Church Baptismal Record there. His parents may have been Nonconformists." - G
- It would be usefull to put the things he invented into context with one line explaining what they were. While I do have a background in engineering (CS based tho lol)
out-flow radial turbine
andsingle and double helical gears
are not things I can immediately conjur up mental pictures for and it takes me a while to parse/figure out what they are.- I admit I wasn't absolutely sure what some of these are; but I tried my best to elaborate lol. - G
- Sources check out
- @Sohom Datta: Sorry it took a while! Does this look good? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 04:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good to me, this is good to go! Sohom (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.