This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
James Michael Reardon is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT2: ... that Rev. James Michael Reardon(pictured) was called "the last of the clerical gentlemen"? Source: "Monsignor Reardon". The Minneapolis Star. 14 December 1963. Retrieved 4 November 2024.
Overall: The article was moved to the mainspace on November 4, and nominated the next day for DYK. Length and sourcing are adequate. The article is neutral in tone, and no plagiarism was detected. ALT0 is reasonably interesting, supported by two sentences in the article, but both will need a citation at the end as per WP:DYKHFC. ALT1 is interesting, properly mentioned and cited in the article, and verfied. I have struck ALT2 as not overly interesting to a broad audience. ALT3 is interesting, properly mentioned and cited in the article, and verfied by four combined sources. Both images used in the article have a public domain license on the Commons. The nominated image is used in the article, clear at a low resoultion, but would benefit from cropping. The QPQ requirement is complete. Overall, this nomination is in good condition, with only an outstanding question on ALT0. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 15:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]