Jump to content

Talk:Jake Sullivan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Russia-Trump collusion narrative of 2016

[edit]

I'm not an expert on the Trump collusion "hoax". It sure does look to me the article grandly airbrushes out Jake Sullivan's participation. Wall Street Journal reported: Jake Sullivan participated in giving campaign chairman John Podesta Alfa Bank claims to a reporter. May 20 2022.

See https://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-did-it-robby-mook-michael-sussmann-donald-trump-russia-collusion-alfa-bank-11653084709

Kyle Andrew Brown (talk) 23:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikileaks tie in

[edit]

Is this article of interest? http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/23/emails-top-hillary-aide-was-researching-drug-that-treats-parkinsons-alzheimers/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.96.24 (talk) 05:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Created Colin Kahl article in draft mode. That article can be linked to the 'succeeded by' broken link on this page once Colin Kahl's page is published.

[edit]

The article title right now is probably: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Colin_Kahl

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:300B:C0C:6000:E9A5:DD6:6B29:51B9 (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jake Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag

[edit]

Editors using naked IPs associated with the hometown of the subject and the university where is father taught have removed relevant and properly sourced information on this article in addition to many other edits. Another editor using a named account has popped up suddenly to remove this information again on very sketchy grounds. At the very least an explanation is due and this whole article probably has to be cleaned up.125.227.90.115 (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. I haven't removed anything; I've demanded proper sourcing. Being from the same state or town as the article's subject is not evidence of a COI. You're making spurious accusations, and you should stop. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This type of behavioral evidence is commonly used at COIN. I am not saying there is a definitive connection and I don't need one to add this tag. The pattern of editing, especially the timing and the exact content in dispute are very suspicious.125.227.90.115 (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The connection is so far from being definitive as to be laughable. Again, if you have information you want to add, go ahead and add it if you have reliable sources. But tagging articles with flimsy evidence is disruptive. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Davanta L Valliant

[edit]

Rising sun* vonta jr Valliant st paul 2601:444:8480:5D60:11B3:92A4:2127:D34A (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


parents

[edit]

His parents` names ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:AD4F:A100:E940:AD45:39D1:AE5F (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trader

[edit]

Swamp government 75.76.54.171 (talk) 03:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is Sullivan Jewish?

[edit]

Is Sullivan Jewish? Or, if he claims to be agnostic or whatever, are his ancestors Jews? Thanks in advance to anybody who knows. 80.42.38.99 (talk) 13:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, he's Irish. What's with people asking if he's Jewish, and why does that matter to anyone anyway? 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:10EA:6367:66EC:15DF (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe because of the number of images of him with Israeli politicians? That was why I came to the talk page, to see if there was an explanation for the plethora of them when compared to other images. It just seems weird.
Please note, though, that I haven't even heard of the other conspiracy theories mentioned on this page, so I'm not "one of them". It just seems odd.
--24.80.199.58 (talk) 03:27, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hurley cousin

[edit]

hey jake! i see your grandfather gene hurley in u! 2600:1702:680:8DA0:5567:768A:C77F:4497 (talk) 03:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Who Rules the World

[edit]

"But if Biden is not the man running the USA, then who is? How does the state operate? Well, according to my sources, the most powerful man in Washington, and effectively de facto President, is Jake Sullivan. His official position is National Security Advisor but I am told his work covers far more than this, including domestic policy questions, and he is the person who does the detailed work which Biden cannot do. Which makes it interesting how seldom he appears in the news – which he does primarily when visiting foreign leaders. Sullivan has the classic Atlanticist background, as a Rhodes Scholar to Oxford to supplement his Yale education. He is fanatically pro-NATO and anti-Russian, unquestioningly Zionist and was the architect of the destruction of Libya as senior policy adviser to Hillary Clinton."

I know this can't be added because the author Craig Murray is considered by many Wikipedians to be a conspiracy theorist but is of note given his genuine diplomatic background and the import of his statement. I wonder if it could be mentioned in some way eg 'Some consider Sullivan to be the most powerful person in America, including the president'. 86.187.233.158 (talk) 10:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]