Talk:Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 April 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Info from Worldcat

See the results of a Worldcat search for 'Jahresbericht über die fortschritte der chemischen technologie'. It looks like there is a more-or-less continuous publication with varying titles. It might be worth including all the variant titles in the article and to create redirects here from all the variant titles. Regarding notability, I see that the journal is held by a number of major libraries such as MIT, so I would vote to remove the notability tag. Unfortunately there is no article on the German Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 04:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would indeed be good to include variant titles. I would counsel against using WorlCat as a source, as I have seen all too often that its info is not up to date or even outright incorrect. Given the long history of this journal, I'm rather confident that it must be notable. However, at this point the bare stub we now have does not show this. Nor do I think that the fact that a certain library holds a journal confers notability. I'm a bit short on time right now, but WP:JWG gives some tips on how to find (some) sources that show notability according to WP:NJournals (but note that NJournals currently is heavily contested, see its talk page). Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 10:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]