Talk:JCDecaux/Archives/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions about JCDecaux. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Strange and somewhat partial article
This article seems a little bit strange to me. There is about 3 lines that are helpful to know what is the JCDecaux group. The remaining is just a big non-formated list of legal problems the group has had in the past.
I think there are 2 problems here:
- JCDecaux is a big enough company that a little bit more could be said about its activities
- While JCDecaux is probably not without reproach, I have never heard of them having more legal problems than similar-sized company. The fact that 80% of the article focus on trials gives a (I think) false and non-NPOV impression of an especially corrupted company
Looking quickly through history there is another version that, on the contrary, looks like it has been taken straight from the Public Relation Leaflet. Maybe adding the factual informations from the "PR version" and re-formatting/putting into context the "legal problems version" could provide a somehow balanced article.
I will do that later if: 1- nobody oppose this and 2- I remember to do it
Fab —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.54.130.67 (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, the article needs some updates related to the group’s activities and key figures. As a disclaimer, I am working for JCDecaux, this is why I want to bring this up on the talk page first. If no one opposes, I’d like to edit the article based on factual and publicly sourced information. Thank you.