Talk:Isabelle Westbury

Isabelle Westbury has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 26, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
November 4, 2017	Good article reassessment	Kept

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 30, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Somerset cricketer Izzy Westbury made her senior international debut for the Netherlands aged 15?

Current status: Good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Cricket: Women's cricket / Europe cricket / Somerset Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Women's cricket task force. New participants are always welcome!

This article is within the scope of the Europe cricket task force. New participants are always welcome!

This article is within the scope of the Somerset County Cricket Club task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Cricket Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's cricket task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Izzy Westbury/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Well done.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the Move to England section, is a period missing in this sentence ---> "Appearing for Junior Emeralds, she improved as the tournament progressed, following up scores of 18 and 27 with the tournament's highest score, 89, in the final match[24][25][26]"? I have a question, the article is named "Izzy Westbury" but nowhere in the article is "Izzy" mentioned, just on top of the article.
~~Check [on the missing period]. Before passing the article, I would like to get an answer to my question.~~ -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've added "commonly known as Izzy Westbury" at the top of the article, other than that there is little I can add. The sources I have aren't unanimous in their use of Izzy, but it is definitely her more commonly used name.Harrias ^talk 13:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to know, cause it was something I was very curious about. Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Are free images available of Westbury?
At the moment no, but I hope to get some later this summer. Harrias ^talk 13:39, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added some in now! Harrias ^talk 18:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not that much to do. If the above can be dealt with, I will pass the article. Good luck!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Harrias for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken arm, Facebook

User:82.171.97.163, thanks for the additions to the article. I'm guessing that you are friends with Izzy Westbury on Facebook, and that there is something there about her broken arm. However to those that aren't friends with her there is nothing, and statements made (even by the person) on Facebook, Twitter etc don't really meet the reliable source criteria on Wikipedia. I'd love to be able to include this information, but without a source it can't really be added to a biography of a living person. Harrias ^talk 17:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Nine

Did she really live on Planet Nine? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.6.114 (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Community reassessment

Izzy Westbury

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept Problem sorted AIRcorn (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another of my early Good articles. This one has had some back and forth over the past year; it spent over a year in a similar state to present (with a lot of the GA content removed) before I noticed and restored it. However, my original work isn't that great, and is out of date. The more up-to-date state it is currently in lacks comprehensiveness for GA status, but I'm not really interested in making the two marry up any more. Maybe a happy medium can be found, but not by me. Harrias ^talk 10:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: That was strange. It is easy enough to add updated information with out removing the outdated stuff. It is not like the past disappears. In the end there were only one or two short sentences to add to the good article version to bring it in line with current one. Are you happy with this staying a good article. AIRcorn (talk) 04:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem with me. Harrias ^talk 14:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of information

Eelhovercraft, can you explain why you feel it necessary to remove so much information? Harrias ^talk 18:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given you are using the fact that CricketArchive is no longer free, please check WP:PAYWALL, which says Do not reject reliable sources just because they are difficult or costly to access Spike 'em (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I think the existing cricketing section of the article could do with some paring down, with some details on the end of her career and then a section added for her media career, which seems to be more significant than her playing career. I can find lots of her articles (many mentioned on her own website), but would be good to have independent ones discussing her wrting / commentary. The link in the first sentence does not support the claims that she is a lawyer broadcaster, and only very tenuously shows that she is a sports writer. Spike 'em (talk) 13:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias, yes. It is a long article about a not very high profile person using obscure citations which can not be verified by any public search and about a very narrow period of this person's life. It should be more succinct with better, verifiable sources. It is also poorly written with sentences which are too long, repetition and subjective inferences. Eelhovercraft 10:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

Whilst we're at it, should the article be moved to Isabelle rather than Izzy? It seems all her newspaper articles use Isabelle, as does her twitter page (though her handle is still @izzywestbury). Spike 'em (talk) 13:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spike 'em, yes. Eelhovercraft 10:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]