Talk:India–Bangladesh enclaves

A news item involving India–Bangladesh enclaves was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 11 June 2015.

Wikipedia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: West Bengal Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

International relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Location?

I tried to find this on Google Maps (around "Patgram, Rajshahi, Bangladesh"), and I think I found the correct region because the borders approximately match. But the enclaves and exclaves were not on the map. Am I looking in the wrong region, does Google Maps have it wrong, or have the two countries solved the "problem" since? --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 13:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Every map is a simplification, so that surprises me less than the accuracy of Google's map of Baarle. —Tamfang (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

grammar help

A Bangladeshi exclave administrated Pathgram upzila in Lalmonirhat zila lies within the Indian province of West Bengal.

I'm guessing that this means

A Bangladeshi exclave, administratively part of Pathgram upzila in Lalmonirhat zila, lies within the Indian province of West Bengal.

but I'm not going to change it without confirmation. —Tamfang (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definition?

It is not clear what is meant by a "first order" or "third order" enclave or the difference between an enclave or exclave. Some of it can be gleaned from context, but clear definitions would be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.44.120 (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably a first-order enclave is an ordinary garden-variety enclave (i.e. an island of A territory within the main territory of B), while a second-order enclave is an island of B territory within an island of A territory within the main territory of B, and so on... AnonMoos (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AnonMoos is correct. Just fyi, the article Enclaves and exclaves has definitions that explain the difference.

Jeff in CA 00:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Solution in sight

There is some update on that matter: India and Bangladesh Near Resolution on Border Dispute on "The Diplomat", December 5 2014 --112.198.79.164 (talk) 05:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content moved from article

List of enclaves and exclaves

Bangladesh

In order to distinguish chhits having the same names, serial numbers established by Banerjee (1966)^[1] are shown in parentheses, as (#). The Bangladesh series is separate from the India series.

With 4 exceptions (Chhat Tilai, Baikunthapur Teldhar (#3, #4, #5)), the first-order enclaves, including the 3 composite enclaves, lie entirely within the Cooch Behar District of West Bengal state, India. All 21 counter-enclaves lie within the Rangpur Division of Bangladesh.

Bangladeshi Chhits Within Indian Territory^[2]^[3]	Area (km²)	Notes
Dahagram-Angarpota	18.684	Largest composite exclave of Bangladesh within India, comprises the contiguous Dahagram and Angarpota chhits.
Dahagram❋	15.690	Largest chhit of Bangladesh, part of the Dahagram-Angarpota composite exclave within India.
Nalgram	7.705	Composite exclave of Bangladesh within India, comprises the contiguous Falnapur and Nalgram (#52) chhits.
Nalgram (#52)❋	5.655	Part of the Nalgram composite exclave within India (area includes 2 other smaller chhits, each itself an exclave and true enclave, each also named Nalgram (#53, #54)). Surrounds the Indian counter-enclave, Nalgram Chhit (#111).
Nalgram (#53)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Nalgram (#52).
Nalgram (#54)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Nalgram (#52).
Angarpota❋	2.994	Part of the Dahagram-Angarpota composite exclave within India.
Dakshin Masaldanga	<2.797	Composite exclave of Bangladesh within India, comprises the contiguous Kachua and Dakshin Masaldanga (#74) chhits.
Poaturkuthi	2.387	First-order enclave within India.
Batrigach (#59)	2.337	First-order enclave within India (area includes the smaller Batrigach (#60), itself an exclave and true enclave). Surrounds the Indian counter-enclave, Madnakura Chhit in Bhoti Nath Batrigach.
Batrigach (#60)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Batrigach (#59).
Dakshin Masaldanga (#74)❋	2.312	Part of the Dakshin Masaldanga composite exclave (along with Kachua chhit) within India; area includes 6 other smaller chhits, each also named Dakshin Masaldanga (#73, 75, 76, 77, 78 & 90), each itself an exclave and true enclave.
Dakshin Masaldanga (#73)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Dakshin Masaldanga (#74).
Dakshin Masaldanga (#75)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Dakshin Masaldanga (#74).
Dakshin Masaldanga (#76)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Dakshin Masaldanga (#74).
Dakshin Masaldanga (#77)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Dakshin Masaldanga (#74).
Dakshin Masaldanga (#78)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Dakshin Masaldanga (#74).
Dakshin Masaldanga (#90)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Dakshin Masaldanga (#74).
Falnapur❋	2.050	Part of the Nalgram composite exclave within India.
Sibprasad Mustafi (#67)	1.510	First-order enclave within India (area includes the smaller Sibprasad Mustafi (#68), itself an exclave and true enclave).
Sibprasad Mustafi (#68)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Sibprasad Mustafi (#67).
Chhit Kuchlibari	1.500	First-order enclave within India.
Bala Pukhari	1.342	First-order enclave within India.
Karala (#63)	1.092	First-order enclave within India (area includes 2 other smaller chhits, each itself an exclave and true enclave, each also named Karala (#64, #65)).
Karala (#64)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Karala (#63).
Karala (#65)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Karala (#63).
Kismat Batrigach	0.850	First-order enclave within India.
Dhabalsati Mirgipur	0.704	First-order enclave within India.
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 111	0.685	Counter-exclave surrounded by and sharing borders with two contiguous Indian chhits, Balapara Khagrabari (#42) and Kothajni (#43) (both within the composite exclave named "Balapara Khagrabari" in the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh).
Purba Masaldanga (#87)	0.623	First-order enclave within India (area includes the smaller Purba Masaldanga (#86), itself an exclave and true enclave). A map from the 1930s and a 1940 source^[4] imply that Purba Masaldanga (#86) and (#87) form a single enclave. However, topographic mapping and other sources suggest two enclaves, as listed here, but if joined, they are connected across the narrowest gap separating them, along a beel (marshy former river course).^[2]
Purba Masaldanga (#86)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Purba Masaldanga (#87).
Paschim Bakalir Chhara	0.615	First-order enclave within India.
Madhya Masaldanga	0.553	First-order enclave within India. Surrounds the Indian counter-enclave, Chhit Seoruguri.
Mahishmari	0.497	First-order enclave within India.
Kachua❋	0.485	Part of the Dakshin Masaldanga composite exclave (along with Dakshin Masaldanga #74) within India.
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 110	0.449	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Dahala Khagrabari (#47), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. It surrounds the only counter-counter-enclave in the world, Dahala Khagrabari (#51).
Chhit Panbari	0.439	First-order enclave within India.
Jote Nijjama	0.354	First-order enclave within India; although not definite, it possibly forms an international quadripoint (one point in common with four different areas) of Bangladesh and India: two parts of Patgram thana (main part and the Jote Nijjama enclave itself) in Lalmonirhat District and two parts of Mekhliganj thana in Mekhliganj subdivision, Cooch Behar District, India.
Chhat Tilai	0.330	First-order enclave within India, straddling the border of Cooch Behar District (West Bengal) and Dhubri District (Assam).
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 22	0.292	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Dahala Khagrabari (#47), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Chhit Land of Jagatber No. 3	0.283	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Dhabalsati	0.269	First-order enclave within India.
Dhabalsati (#32)	0.245	First-order enclave within India.
Baikunthapur Teldhar (#4)	0.210	First-order enclave within Jalpaiguri District, West Bengal, India (area includes 2 other smaller chhits, each itself an exclave and true enclave, each also named Baikunthapur Teldhar (#3, #5)).
Baikunthapur Teldhar (#3)	see above	First-order enclave within Jalpaiguri District, West Bengal, India (area combined with that shown for the larger Baikunthapur Teldhar (#4)).
Baikunthapur Teldhar (#5)	see above	First-order enclave within Jalpaiguri District, West Bengal, India (area combined with that shown for the larger Baikunthapur Teldhar (#4)).
Chhit Nalgram (#55)	0.200	First-order enclave within India (area includes Chhit Nalgram (#56), itself an exclave and true enclave).
Chhit Nalgram (#56)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for Chhit Nalgram (#55).
Uttar Bansjani	0.191	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Bhandardaha	0.162	First-order enclave within India.
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 113	0.148	Counter-exclave surrounded by and sharing a border with two contiguous Indian exclaves, Balapara Khagrabari (#42) and Kothajni (#43) (both within the composite exclave named "Balapara Khagrabari" in the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh).
Purba Chhit Masaldanga (#84)	0.142	First-order enclave within India (area includes the smaller Purba Chhit Masaldanga (#83), itself an exclave and true enclave).
Purba Chhit Masaldanga (#83)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Purba Chhit Masaldanga (#84).
Bara Saradubi	0.141	First-order enclave within India; forms an international quadripoint (one point in common with four different areas) of Bangladesh and India: two parts of Hatibandha thana (main part and the Bara Saradubi enclave itself) in Lalmonirhat District and two parts of Sitalkuchi thana in Mathabhanga subdivision, Cooch Behar District, India.
Chandrakhan	0.140	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian true enclave/exclave, Dasiar Chhara (#117), located within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Madhya Bakalir Chhara	0.132	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Land of Jagatber No. 1	0.124	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Kokoabari	0.1193	First-order enclave within India.
Paschim Masaldanga (#79)	0.1193	First-order enclave within India (area includes Paschim Masaldanga (#80), itself an exclave and true enclave).
Paschim Masaldanga (#80)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for Paschim Masaldanga (#79).
Uttar Masaldanga	0.1104	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Land of Jagatber No. 2	0.1096	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Land of Dhabalguri No. 2	0.1086	First-order enclave within India.
Bansua Khamar Gitaldaha	0.0993	First-order enclave within India.
Uttar Dhaldanga (#93)	0.0966	First-order enclave within India (area includes 2 other smaller chhits, each itself an exclave and true enclave, each also named Uttar Dhaldanga (#92, #94)).
Uttar Dhaldanga (#92)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Uttar Dhaldanga (#93).
Uttar Dhaldanga (#94)	see above	First-order enclave within India, area combined with that shown for the larger Uttar Dhaldanga (#93).
Chhit Dhabalguri	0.0903	First-order enclave within India.
Durgapur	0.0848	First-order enclave within India.
Nazirganj (#10)	0.0799 †	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Bewladanga (#39), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Teldhar (#1)	0.0586	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian true enclave/exclave, Garati (#1), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh (area includes the smaller Teldhar (#2), itself an exclave and true enclave).
Teldhar (#2)	see above	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian true enclave/exclave, Garati (#1), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, area combined with that shown for the larger Teldhar (#1).
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 112	0.0571	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Kothajni (#43), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Chhit Land of Dhabalguri No. 1	0.0565	First-order enclave within India.
Dhabalguri	0.0506	First-order enclave within India.
Purba Bakalir Chhara	0.0495	First-order enclave within India.
Madhya Chhit Masaldanga	0.0480	First-order enclave within India.
Jongra	0.0334	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian true enclave/exclave, Banskata (#93), located within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Paschim Chhit Masaldanga	0.0308	First-order enclave within India.
Debi Doba	0.0302	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Dahala Khagrabari (#47), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Nazirganj −29	0.0265	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian true enclave/exclave, Nazirganj (#27), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Debottar Saldanga	0.0247	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Bewladanga (#39), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Chhit Land of Dhabalguri No. 4	0.0184	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Land of Dhabalguri No. 5	0.0167	First-order enclave within India.
Bamandal	0.0089	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Land of Kuchlibari	0.0074	First-order enclave within India.
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 99	0.0071	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Kothajni (#43), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Dhabalsati (#33)	0.0065	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Bara Khangir (#66), located within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Nazirganj (#8)	0.0062 †	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Shalbari (#35), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 13	0.0054	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Kothajni (#43), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Chhit Land of Dhabalguri No. 3	0.0054	First-order enclave within India.
Amjhol	0.0051	First-order enclave within India.
Chhit Land of Panbari No. 2	0.0046	First-order enclave within India.
Nazirganj −30	0.0046	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian true enclave/exclave, Nazirganj (#19), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Srirampur	0.0042	First-order enclave within India.
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 15	0.0041	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Dahala Khagrabari (#47), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Nazirganj (#9)	0.00291 †	Counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Shalbari (#35), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Upan Chowki Bhajni, 24	0.00287	Smallest known chhit of Bangladesh, a counter-enclave surrounded by an Indian exclave, Kothajni (#43), located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.

❋ This chhit is part of a composite enclave and by itself is neither an enclave nor an exclave.

† Stated size may not be exact.^[2]

India

The 102 first-order enclaves (including the 6 composite enclaves) and the 1 counter-counter enclave lie within the Rangpur Division of Bangladesh. The 3 counter-enclaves lie within the Cooch Behar District of West Bengal state, India. In order to distinguish chhits having the same names, serial numbers established by Banerjee (1966)^[1] are shown in parentheses, as (#). The India series is separate from the Bangladesh series.

Indian Chhits Within Bangladeshi Territory^[2]^[3]	Area (km²)	Notes
Balapara Khagrabari	25.952	Composite exclave of India, bordering the Panchagarh and Nilphamari Districts, Bangladesh, comprises the contiguous Dahala Khagrabari (#47), Kothajni (#43) and Balapara Khagrabari (#42) chhits (area includes 6 other smaller chhits, each itself an exclave and true enclave: 3 also named Dahala Khagrabari (#48, #49, #50) and 3 also named Kothajni (#44, #45, #46)).
Shalbari	14.091	Composite exclave of India within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, comprises the contiguous Shalbari (#35), Bewladanga (#39), Kajal Dighi, Daikhata Chhat, Nataoka (#37) and Nataoka (#38) chhits.
Dahala Khagrabari (#47)❋	10.717	Largest chhit of India, part of Balapara Khagrabari composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh (area includes 3 other smaller chhits, each itself an exclave and true enclave, each also named Dahala Khagrabari (#48, #49, #50)).
Dahala Khagrabari (#48)	see above	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, area combined with that shown for the larger Dahala Khagrabari (#47).
Dahala Khagrabari (#49)	see above	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, area combined with that shown for the larger Dahala Khagrabari (#47).
Dahala Khagrabari (#50)	see above	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, area combined with that shown for the larger Dahala Khagrabari (#47).
Kothajni (#43)❋	8.143	Part of Balapara Khagrabari composite exclave, bordering the Panchagarh and Nilphamari Districts, Bangladesh (area includes 3 other smaller chhits, each itself an exclave and true enclave, each also named Kothajni (#44, #45, #46)).
Kothajni (#44)	see above	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, area combined with that shown for the larger Kothajni (#43).
Kothajni (#45)	see above	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, area combined with that shown for the larger Kothajni (#43).
Kothajni (#46)	see above	First-order exclave bordering the Panchagarh and Nilphamari Districts, Bangladesh, area combined with that shown for the larger Kothajni (#43).
Balapara Khagrabari (#42)❋	7.092	Part of Balapara Khagrabari composite exclave, bordering the Panchagarh District and Nilphamari Districts, Bangladesh.
Dasiar Chhara	6.651	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Shalbari (#35)❋	4.811	Part of Shalbari composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Garati (#1)	3.920	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Bewladanga (#39)❋	3.479	Part of Shalbari composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Kajal Dighi❋	3.122	Part of Shalbari composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Daikhata Chhat❋	2.020	Part of Shalbari composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#33)	1.758	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#93)	1.675	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Kamat Changrabandha	1.626	Composite exclave of India within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh, comprises the contiguous Bhotbari (#74), Panisala (#77) and Kamat Changrabandha (#75, #76) chhits.
Banskata (#97)	1.275	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Lotamari (#83)	1.147	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Kharkharia	0.904	Composite exclave of India within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh, comprises the contiguous Lotamari (#73), Kharkharia (#71) and Kharkharia (#72) chhits.
Bans Pachai	0.879	First-order exclave bordering the Lalmonirhat and Kurigram Districts, Bangladesh.
Bhotbari (#74)❋	0.831	Part of Kamat Changrabandha composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Natatoka (#37)❋	0.657	Part of Shalbari composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Panisala (#77)❋	0.557	Part of Kamat Changrabandha composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bara Khangir	0.523	Composite exclave of India within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh, comprises the contiguous Bara Khangir (#66) and Chhat Bagdokra chhits.
Gotamuri Chhit (#112)	0.512	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Putimari	0.497	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Lotamari (#73)❋	0.449	Part of Kharkharia composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Lotamari (#84)	0.400	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bara Khangir (#66)❋	0.354	Part of Bara Khangir composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bans Pachai Bhitarkuthi	0.331	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja	0.309	Composite exclave of India within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh, comprises the contiguous Najirgonja (#28, #29, #30, #31) chhits.
Garati (#3)	0.298	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#27)	0.297	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Panisala (#81)	0.262	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Kharkharia (#71)❋	0.246	Part of Kharkharia composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Ratanpur	0.238	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#32)	0.236	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Garati (#6)	0.236	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#96)	0.234	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Chhat Bhothat	0.227	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Balapukhari	0.226	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#19)	0.219	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#31)❋	0.216	Part of Najirgonja composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Kharkharia (#72)❋	0.209	Part of Kharkharia composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Panisala (#82)	0.208	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bara Khangir (#65)	0.204	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#25)	0.198	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. Najirgonja (#25) and (#26) are shown joined as one in pre-1947 maps, but as separate in 1991 Indian census maps.^[2]^[5]
Dwarikamari (#86)	0.185	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Seotikursa	0.185	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Uponchowki Kuhlibari (#62)	0.178	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Kamat Changrabandha (#75)❋	0.173	Part of Kamat Changrabandha composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Chhat Bagdokra❋	0.169	Part of Bara Khangir composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bara Gaochulka	0.162	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Dwarikamari (#85)	0.160	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bhotbari (#63)	0.149	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bara Khanki Kharija Gitaldaha (#54)	0.149	First-order enclave within the Nilphamari District of Bangladesh.
Dwarikamarikhasbash	0.148	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Chhoto Guraljhara I	0.145	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Madnakura Chhit in Bhoti Nath Batrigach	0.144	Counter-enclave surrounded by a Bangladeshi true enclave/exclave, Batrigach (#59), located within Cooch Behar District of West Bengal state, India.
Nagarjikabari	0.135	First-order enclave within the Nilphamari District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#100)	0.134	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Shahebganj	0.128	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#104)	0.125 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#94)	0.1244	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Barakhangir	0.1236	First-order enclave within the Nilphamari District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#99)	0.1182	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bagdokra	0.1032	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#109)	0.0986 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#88)	0.0904	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Kalamati	0.0858	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#90)	0.0853	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Gotamuri Chhit (#113)	0.081	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Panisala (#80)	0.0729	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Garati (#4)	0.0728	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. Garati (#4) and (#5) are shown joined as one enclave in pre-1947 topographic maps, in which the smaller (#5) adjoins the northern boundary of the larger (#4). Later sources (1991 Indian census maps^[5] and Banerjee, 1966^[1]) depict them as separate.^[2]
Najirgonja (#29)❋	0.0726	Part of Najirgonja composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Chhoto Guraljhara II	0.0722	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#108)	0.0686 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Kamat Changrabandha (#76)❋	0.0648	Part of Kamat Changrabandha composite exclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Dakurhat Dakinir Kuthi	0.0577	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#16)	0.0575	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#101)	0.0515 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Dighaltari I	0.0498	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#26)	0.0493	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. Najirgonja (#25) and (#26) are shown joined as one in pre-1947 maps, but as separate in 1991 Indian census maps.^[2]^[5]
Banskata (#95)	0.0492	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#89)	0.0484	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Gaochulka I	0.0361	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Dighaltari II	0.0357	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#17)	0.0335	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Chenakata	0.0316 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bara Khanki Kharija Gitaldaha (#53)	0.0312	First-order enclave within the Nilphamari District of Bangladesh.
Shingimari Part I	0.0246 ± 0.0013	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Kuchlibari (#57)	0.0234	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Jamaldaha Balapukhari	0.0212 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#24)	0.0204 †	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Nalgram Chhit	0.0191	Counter-enclave surrounded by a Bangladeshi exclave, Nalgram (#52), located within Cooch Behar District of West Bengal state, India.
Bara Kuchlibari	0.0176 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#28)❋	0.01574	Part of Najirgonja composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#20)	0.01566 †	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Bewladanga (#40)	0.01097	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#103)	0.01032 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Chhit Seoruguri	0.01016	Smallest Indian counter-enclave, surrounded by a Bangladeshi true enclave/exclave, Madhya Masaldanga, located within Cooch Behar District of West Bengal state, India.
Banskata (#102)	0.00943 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Kuchlibari (#58)	0.00826	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Garati (#2)	0.00704	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Dahala Khagrabari (#51)	0.00688	Dahala Khagrabari (#51) is the only counter-counter enclave in the world. It is surrounded by Upanchowki Bhajni 110, a Bangladeshi counter-enclave within the Indian composite exclave named Balapara Khagrabari, which is surrounded by the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. Dahala Khagrabari (#51) is not part of the Balapara Khagrabari composite exclave, as it is not contiguous to it and borders only Bangladesh.
Bhogramguri	0.00583 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#106)	0.00563 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#107)	0.00554 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja Chhit (#30)❋	0.00433	Part of Najirgonja composite exclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#22)	0.00421 †	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#21)	0.00413 †	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Gaochulka II	0.00364	First-order enclave within the Kurigram District of Bangladesh.
Fulker Dabri	0.00356 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Bewladanga Chhat (#41)	0.00336 †	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Garati (#5)	0.00320	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. Garati (#4) and (#5) are shown joined as one enclave in pre-1947 topographic maps, in which the smaller (#5) adjoins the northern boundary of the larger (#4). Later sources (1991 Indian census maps^[5] and Banerjee, 1966^[1]) depict them as separate.^[2]
Najirgonja (#23)	0.00312 †	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#98)	0.00312	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#105)	0.00259 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Najirgonja (#15)	0.00210	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Dahala Khagrabari (#52)	0.00178	First-order enclave within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh.
Uponchowki Kuchlibari (#61)	0.00129 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Banskata (#110)	0.00113 †	First-order enclave within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Panisala (#79)	0.00109 †	The smallest Indian true enclave; located within the Lalmonirhat District of Bangladesh.
Natatoka (#38)❋	0.00105	Smallest known chhit of India, part of Shalbari composite exclave; located within the Panchagarh District of Bangladesh; borders Bangladesh and Shalbari (#35).

❋ This chhit is part of a composite enclave and by itself is neither an enclave nor an exclave.

† Stated size may not be exact.^[2]

External links

References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Banerjee, R. (1966). "An Account of Exclaves – Origin and Development". Census 1961, West Bengal, District Census Handbook, Cooch Behar. West Bengal Government, India.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Cite error: The named reference Whyte was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ ^a ^b Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Hartley, A. C. (1940). Final Report of the Rangpur Survey and Settlement Operations, 1931–1938. Bengal Govt.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Census of India District Census Handbooks, for Cooch Behar and Jalpaiguri, for 1991 census. West Bengal Government, India. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Discussion

You stated: "The table was removed before the "enclaves" story was posted. Then you re-inserted the table without much improvements, aside from two sources."

What are you talking about? The articles on enclaves and exclaves have existed for years. The tables in this article have been here for years. The articles on enclaves and exclaves have referred to this article from the first day that the tables appeared in this article. Also, you stated that your objection to the table was that it wasn't sourced. The source of all the information in the tables is Dr. Brendan Whyte's Ph.D. thesis, and his thesis is cited 15 times altogether in the article. Nevertheless I posted an additional citation before the first table. Within the two tables there are 13 citations to sources, including several of the original sources that Dr. Whyte cited in his own work. What exactly do you think should be improved? Jeff in CA (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well... the IP address removed it first, not me. The Rambling Man at the time had issues with the article quality, especially the table. I tried to access one source without avail. --George Ho (talk) 06:53, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Number of enclaves?

In the beginning of the article, it says that there are 106 Indian enclave, and then later it says India has agreed to give Bangladesh 111 Indian enclaves. Liam987 talk 17:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

106 is the number of first-order enclaves, not the total number of enclaves. There are also four second-order enclaves and one third-order enclave. So that gives a total of 111 enclaves. I have now made the required changes in the article. 117.192.169.198 (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But now the sentence doesn't make sense since it says there are 106 first order enclaves and that "102 of these are first-order Indian enclaves". I think the discrepancy is due to whether one counts true enclaves or chitts. TDL (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's 106+4+1 as said before. The figure 102 probably comes from a 1960s estimate by Banerjee or someone (not sure as I haven't checked it). Clarification is needed on these numbers. 17:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.60.210 (talk)

Here is some useful information directly from Dr. Brendan Whyte's Ph.D. thesis, which is the source for much of the detailed enclave information in the article.

"Ranges of and reasons for variance in enclave counts"

"The number of enclaves at Cooch Behar is not disputed as such, but the figures available from media and political sources are remarkably varied, reflecting the lack of good maps and easily obtainable accurate official information, and hence a reliance on secondary sources. This situation is complicated by the complexity of the boundary, Subcontinental confusion of the terms chhit and enclave, and the lack of a one-to-one relationship between enclaves, chhits and mauzas. Further factors are the transferal of several Cooch Behar exclaves to Jalpaiguri in 1952 and 1955, and the existence of numerous counter-enclaves. The counter-enclaves, together with Dahagram-Angarpota, will not be exchanged when the Indira-Mujib agreement of 1974 is finally implemented. There are therefore two totals of enclaves quoted in the media or by officials: total enclaves, and exchangeable enclaves."

"Individual enclaves which are composed of several administrative units will be termed composite enclaves, to allow differentiation of the individual units from the enclave as a whole. This is particularly important for the Cooch Behar enclaves, where the several administrative units which together form some of the larger enclaves are commonly, but wrongly, termed enclaves themselves, or where one component unit commonly lends its name to the whole enclave."

"The figures of 130 [Indian] and 95 [Bangladeshi] 'enclaves', given in Banerjee (1966) … reduce to 119 and 72 exchangeable enclaves. However these over-estimate the actual number of enclaves by counting each chhit within composite enclaves. On the other hand, the official Indo-Bangladesh Boundary Commission figure of 111 [Indian] and 51 [Bangladeshi] exchangeable enclaves would appear to count only individual mauzas, even when these consisted of more than one enclave."

"The 106 international enclaves can be broken down by Bangladeshi host district as follows:

• 34 in Panchagarh district, including the 1 counter-counter-enclave,

• 1 between Panchagarh and Nilphamari,

• 4 in Nilphamari,

• 53 in Lalmonirhat, including 2 counter-enclaves,

• 1 between Lalmonirhat and Kurigram,

• 13 in Kurigram, including 1 counter-enclave.

"The counter-enclaves will not be exchanged when the Indira-Mujib Agreement is implemented."

Jeff in CA (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the source Jeff! That confirms my suspicions above. I think for our purposes we want to discuss "real" enclaves, not administrative divisions, so the 106 number is correct. TDL (talk) 03:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is the definition of a chhit?

I don't know if the word refers to a legal or physical demarcation of land, and my ignorance makes it difficult to read the article. I suggest that the word should be defined when it first occurs, and its spelling should be standardized throughout the article. Richard Keatinge (talk) 10:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's easiest to think of a chhit as a parcel of land, with one or more chhits comprising an enclave. Jeff in CA (talk) 08:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out by Jeff CA above, a chhit or simply chit refers to small pieces of something, such as a chit of paper and contemporary meaning handing out to parcels of land; which the King and neighbouring Maharajas exchanged as a parcel or small pieces of areas involving landlords exchanging them within the territory. MekoScopiBangle (talk) 07:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

How can Bangladesh be receiving 111 Indian enclaves if there are only 106 Indian enclaves? --Khajidha (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion above under #Number of enclaves?. It's a question of whether one counts contiguous areas or administrative divisions. TDL (talk) 22:39, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Something needs to be added to the article to explain this. --Khajidha (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 June 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Proposed titles created as redirects. Jenks24 (talk) 03:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

India-Bangladesh enclaves → Bangladesh–India enclaves – (Note: The divider is an endash, –) In line with the titles for fully-NPOV diplomatic relations between countries, such as Bangladesh–Taiwan relations or Afghanistan–Bangladesh relations, the countries are named in alphabetic order. I've brought this up after the page was finished featuring in the main-page news. Provided there is no strong resistance and this move goes through, a redirect will be needed from Bangladesh-India enclaves (hyphen not endash) to the new endashed Bangladesh–India enclaves. – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 05:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The current name is almost universally the common usage in references, and that is what should be used here. There are numerous other examples of common usage that don't involve alphabetic order. E.g. Franco-Belgian_comics, Russo-Japanese_War, Sino-Indian_War, Franco-Ethiopian Railway which is now the Ethio-Djibouti Railways, and many many more. Common usage is often based on the larger country being named first. This is because people naturally put their own country first and in most cases there are more writers in the larger country. Imc (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This still seems like a serious violation of WP:NPOV here. I do hope that you notice this and reconsider the problem. – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 23:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with regard to common name, See Ngrams. What do you think are the effects of the NPOV? Greg Kaye 04:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well it doesn't help when there's a larger population of writers who make references who would like to put India first, but as you can see there's still people who put India later according to the alphabetical order. It promotes a neutral view of everything rather than preferring one side over another... I mean, what if someone kept putting India last even if it should've been first?
I think there's some serious problem here, for example, see the same Ngram link but with China. Even with China's much larger population than India, it appears that (most probably biased) writers put India first. It definitely seems unfair to use metrics of population, Wikipedia should not prefer one country over another just on population. For example why it does not work, see this Ngrams link with France. Even with France's small population compared to India, Ngrams shows that France-India is universally used over India-France, therefore showing population is no metric for preference — neutrality should be preferred here. – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 08:53, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"what if someone kept putting India last even if it should've been first?" You are assuming that there is some order in which the names should go. You are the one talking about it being "unfair" and showing a preference for one country over another. There IS no specific order that should always be used. There is no ranking of countries by the order in which they are written. I find it absolutely ridiculous that anyone should be so emotionally caught up on the order of two words. The names are listed in the order they are because that is the order in which they are most often used by reliable sources. End of story. --Khajidha (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Listing Bangladesh first is no more NPOV than listing India first, it is merely the opposite POV. I concur with the sentiment above that listing India first is the WP:COMMONNAME. Compare 590 vs 2 from Google Books hits. It isn't our responsibility to try to determine why common usage is the way it is. Even if you believe that this isn't fair or that all writers that list India first are biased, WP:POVTITLE says we should still use the common name even if it isn't neutral. TDL (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Of course the current title is the one most commonly used. Wikipedia gives priority to common usage of the name, and in no way is it a "violation of NPOV". Yankees–Red Sox rivalry is a prime example for this. 117.192.174.42 (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What on earth? Support per actual Wikipedia policy, WP:AND. Red Slash 18:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In Indic scripts, I precedes B; on another hand, Bangla precedes Bharat. Hey, could alphabetical order be why my history teacher consistently said "Japanese Russo War"? —Tamfang (talk) 16:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Bangla script, Ba[angla] (ব) precedes Bha[rowt] (ভ) so here comes the problem again! – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 20:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't I just say that? — Oh, now I see the ambiguity. —Tamfang (talk) 07:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per WP:AND, "India-Bangladesh enclaves" is definitely not the common term for this subject as different sources use different terms. Title should be in alphabetical order in line with Bangladesh-India relations, Bangladesh-India border etc. --Zayeem ^(talk) 12:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not worthy of the move and imho NPOV violation. Devopam (talk) 04:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Berubari

I see a lot of oblique mentions of the Berubari problem, but what and where is it?? —Tamfang (talk) 20:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The journal Punjab Geographer of October, 2009, has an article with the following end note: "The Berubari dispute was one arising from an omission in the written text of the Radcliff Award (Radcliff Award was to decide Indo-Pakistan boundary in the eastern sector between East Bengal and West Bengal) and erroneous depiction on the map annexed therewith. Radcliff had divided the district of Jalpaiguri between India and Pakistan by awarding some thanas to one country and others to the other country. The boundary line was determined on the basis of the boundaries of the thanas. In describing this boundary, Radcliff omitted to mention one thana. Berubari Union No. 12 lies within Jalpaiguri thana which was awarded to India. However, the omission of the thana Boda and the erroneous depiction on the map referred to above, enabled Pakistan to claim that a part of Berubari belonged to it. The dispute of Berubari was resolved by the Nehru-Noon Agreement of 1958 whereby half of Berubari Union No. 12 was to be given to Pakistan and the other half adjacent to India was to be retained by India. In addition, four Coochbehar enclaves contiguous of this part would also have gone to Pakistan. The total area of South Berubari Union No. 12 is 22.58 km2 of which 11.29 km2 was to go to Bangladesh. The area of the four Coochbehar enclaves which would also have to go to Bangladesh was 6.84 km2 making the total area to be transferred 18.13 km2. The population of the area including the four enclaves to be transferred, as per 1967 data, was 90% Hindu. The Bangladeshi enclaves, Dahagram and Angrapota, were to be transferred to India. Their total area was 18.68 km2 and as per 1967 data more than 80% of their population was Muslim. If this exchange had gone through, it would have meant a change of nationality for the population or migration of the population from Dahagram and Angrapota and South Berubari Union No. 12 and consequent serious rehabilitation problems. There were major agitations by the people of Berubari protesting against the transfer." Jeff in CA (talk) 11:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

confusion of units

Under this agreement, India will get 51 Bangladeshi enclaves (i.e., 51 or more chhits, covering 7,110 acres (2,880 ha)) in the Indian mainland, while Bangladesh will get 111 Indian chhits (i.e., 95 or more enclaves, covering 17,160 acres (6,940 ha)) in the Bangladeshi mainland.

Does the agreement really specify 51 Bangladeshi enclaves (consisting of an unstated number of chhits) and 111 Indian chhits (making up an unstated number of enclaves)?? —Tamfang (talk) 20:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't. Those numbers are derived from a detailed inspection of the lists (from Whyte (2002)) compared to the published reports in the news media. Jeff in CA (talk) 08:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

one end of Tin Bigha Corridor

The Tin Bigha Corridor, a strip of Indian territory 85 metres (279 ft) wide running from the Dahagram–Angarpota composite enclave to the Bangladeshi mainland at their nearest approach ...

Does the corridor lead to Dahagram or to Angarpota? —Tamfang (talk) 09:04, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The corridor leads to Dahagram, while Angarpota is at the opposite end of the composite enclave. There is a map showing this in Whyte (2002). Jeff in CA (talk) 05:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Number of enclaves left after the swap?

Is there now, after the land exchange, a "normal" border between India and Bangladesh? Or are there still un-exchanged enclaves along the border. THE ARTICLE IS VERY UNCLEAR ABOUT THIS. If there still are un-exchanged territories, please make a complete list over them, in addition to the Former Enclaves list.

Stein S., Oslo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.213.30.97 (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is one enclave that remains after the exchange, Dahagram-Angarpota. The "unexchanged" enclaves to which the article refers are the counter-enclaves. When the enclaves that contained the counter-enclaves were exchanged, those counter-enclaves were "freed", or dis-enclaved. The enclaves around them went away, so the counter-enclaves automatically ceased to be enclaves as well, because they were unexchanged. Jeff in CA (talk) 08:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1947 and all that

I have been puzzled over why the exclaves were not wiped out in the Partition, and recently learned the answer, which is not given in the article. Cooch Behar, with its exclaves and holes, was a native state (the only one in Bengal?), whose raja had the option of joining either India or Pakistan. If he joined Pakistan, the exclave problem would vanish, but he didn't. The only way I see for the Radcliff Commission to avoid the problem completely was to offer the raja a swap; perhaps some members of the Commission vetoed that. —Tamfang (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on India–Bangladesh enclaves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Positions and/or Numbers

Could someone put the number of all the enclaves like Durgapur [example: Paschim Masaldanga (#79)], or put the coordinates for the ex-location of the enclaves, because sometimes they are small and it can be difficult localize some of them. --189.131.202.21 (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

India and Bangladesh Swap Territory

India and Bangladesh Swap Territory, Citizens in Landmark Enclave Exchange — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.96.37.1 (talk) 07:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[Banerjee-1] Banerjee, R. (1966). "An Account of Exclaves – Origin and Development". Census 1961, West Bengal, District Census Handbook, Cooch Behar. West Bengal Government, India.

[Whyte-2] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Cite error: The named reference Whyte was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[:0-3] Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[4] Hartley, A. C. (1940). Final Report of the Rangpur Survey and Settlement Operations, 1931–1938. Bengal Govt.

[India-5] Census of India District Census Handbooks, for Cooch Behar and Jalpaiguri, for 1991 census. West Bengal Government, India. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]