Talk:In the Company of Men

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Bullshit

"The film currently has an 88% Fresh rating at the movie review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, with 46 out of 52 critics rating it "Fresh".

How does bullshit like this find it's way into an encyclopaedia?

--No clue. This whole article sucks. This is probably the worst-written article I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Was this someone's high-school essay on this movie? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.193.182.86 (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the review rating is backed up by RT, with the percentage being a little higher than it is in the article. It does need cleanup, but this easily passes WP:NFILM.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In the Company of Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306152613/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/173227-Neil-LaButes-Revised-Stage-Version-of-In-the-Company-of-Men-To-Premiere-in-Chicago to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/173227-Neil-LaButes-Revised-Stage-Version-of-In-the-Company-of-Men-To-Premiere-in-Chicago

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]