Talk:IOS/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 18:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will give you the benefit of the doubt and not quick fail this nomination. There are several sentences that have no citations/references. Some quick examples that I found:

"Since iOS 3.2, users are able to set a background image for the Home screen. This feature is only available on third-generation devices—iPhone 3GS, third-generation iPod touch (iOS 4.0 or newer), all iPad models (since iOS 3.2)—or newer."

Most of the "Notification Center" sub-section.

Second paragraph in the "Digital rights management" sub-section.

I will place this nomination on hold for a couple days to allow you to find reliable sources for the sentences that are missing references. Afterwords I will continue with a full review.--Dom497 (talk) 18:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Failing nomination since there has been no activity on this review and the article still has some ways to go before being properly ready for a nomination.--Dom497 (talk) 14:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]