Talk:Hydromancy

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Water

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge to Scrying

I recommend Hydromancy be merged to Scrying. Please comment at Talk:Scrying. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-02 01:35Z

Moved to Talk:Scrying

Alternative name

Isn't another name for this "Hydroscopy"? Could be a possible redirect if so. -- œ ^™ 13:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hunh?

I removed:

, at the same time as taking special care to show that the betrothment of the Adriatic by the Doge of Venice had a wholly different origin

Because this is totally unclear...Clean Copy^talk 11:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scrying and Hydromancy

I am a hydromancer. It disappointments me to see nowhere in the article a mention of scrying. Scrying (the entering into a trance as stimulated by the method/facilitation) is in fact the essence of hydromancy. Thus, the most potent method of hydromancy is actually the simple entering into of a trance while staring at water in one particular form. No need for all the rings and ripples and oil. I am thus in favor of merging this article with scrying or at least mentioning scrying in this article. 203.129.28.129 (talk) 04:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]