Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Rick (2009)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHurricane Rick (2009) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 12, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 1, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
January 25, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
February 12, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
August 17, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Featured article

Update

[edit]

I post that template on the article because this stuff on it is not the most current. At the time I am writing this, Rick is a category 1 not a category 3. --12george1 (talk) 02:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

In the future it would be nice to have a water vapor image of Rick at peak intensity, which was unquestionably "spectacular." Gm03us (talk) 15:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why a water vapor image? The main image for the article was taken when Rick was at its record intensity. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simply because it illustrated well the astounding characteristics of the storm when at peak intensity; it was the quintessential textbook image of an intense hurricane. I remember cycling through the images when it was at peak intensity, and that one struck me the most. The visible image, while impressive, doesn't come close to some of the enhanced imagery of this storm. 97.96.164.147 (talk) 00:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is WP:WPTC policy to use the peak visible image, if possible. However, it can be added somewhere else in the article, such as the Met. History.

Why?

[edit]

Why is section United States left blank? Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

I haven't gotten around to it yet....patience... Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rick 2009-10-17 2020Z.jpg to appear as POTD soon

[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Rick 2009-10-17 2020Z.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 22, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-12-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 18:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Rick
Hurricane Rick was the second-most intense Pacific hurricane on record and the strongest ever to form during October. Developing south of Mexico on October 15, 2009, the storm attained Category 5 status on the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale two days later and soon attained its peak intensity with winds of 180 mph (290 km/h; 156 kn) and the barometric pressure bottomed out at 906 mbar (906.00 hPa; 26.75 inHg). By the time it made landfall near Mazatlán, its winds had dropped to 55 mph (89 km/h; 48 kn) and it was reclassified as a tropical depression a few hours later.Photo: NASA/MODIS Rapid Response Team
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Rick (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Hurricane Rick (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 April 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hurricane Rick (2009)Hurricane Rick – Very prominent Rick! I admit this is a primary topic for sure! :) --SMB99thx XD (contribs) 09:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose sorry, same as the others, the year is a critical part of the identity even if (1985) and (1997) did less damage. Also for readers affected by any particular one, that one is their major topic. There is no absolute Hurricane Rick. This isn't Paris vs Paris, Texas. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Rick (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rounding errors

[edit]

The introduction says 180 mph (290 km/h) but the infobox 180 mph (285 km/h). According to the source [1] it was estimated of 155 kt, which is around 178 mph (287 km/h), also the source [2] states around 285 km/h. Vergessenes Wissen (talk) 10:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"flood damage amounted to $690,000"

[edit]

How were the $690,000 calculated? If I add the damage costs according to [3] from 10/22/2009 to 10/26/2009 I come to $569,000. So it looks like the damages from 11/03/2009 and 11/20/2009 were added too, but then why not the 2.000M from 11/01/2009 ? Vergessenes Wissen (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]