Talk:Hong v. Facebook, Inc.

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 March 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

MOS:LEGAL?

Is there such a beast, and if so can some please provide a wikilink. Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 14:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:LEGAL. ― Padenton|✉ 14:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More refs

http://venturebeat.com/2015/03/18/highlights-from-the-sex-discriminationharassment-lawsuit-just-filed-against-facebook/

Highlights from the sex discrimination/harassment lawsuit just filed against Facebook (updated) Ottawahitech (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Case resolved - but on what terms?

Following up, I have found sources (including the court docket) showing that the case has been "resolved." Hong dismissed it, after court-related mediation. I've added that info to the article. But does anybody have, or can they find, a source that gives some indication of the terms on which it was resolved? I'd like to make the outcome more specific, but haven't so far found a published source that knows. --Pechmerle (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pechmerle: I would be interested too, however I doubt reliable sources will become available any time soon. In the meantime I wonder if everyone here agrees to have this article redirected (where to?) before it is nominated for deletion and completely disappears? Ottawahitech (talk) 01:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

How about re-directing this article to List of gender equality lawsuits until such time as wp:RS surface from the bottom of Google search - we can then easily un-redirect it. If we wait and someone nominates it for deletion things get much more complicated. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me[reply]