This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe organ, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Pipe organWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe organTemplate:WikiProject Pipe organPipe organ
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
I believe a discussion about what constitutes a "notable" organ is in order. Russbird17 is clearly an enthusiast regarding this company's organs, and has added extensive information about various organs and their available registrations, expanding the article from 2,735 bytes in early September to over 60Kbytes today. However, there is no criterion given for what constitutes a "notable" organ, and, indeed, the added content seems arbitrary and excessive. A skimming review of other companies in Category:Pipe organ building companies shows that they generally do not include the full specification of voicings available. Instead, a list format, including possible number of manuals and number of pipes, would suffice. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!15:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Russbird17 and @WikiDan61, even though this topic I'm not familiar with, I did run the Rater assessment tool & ORES prediction suggests a Class-B rating. So, I removed the article's stub tags, then updated from Class-Stub to Class-C for now. Yes, I agree the article does have a lot of details, and may need a better Context for the encyclopedia reader. I added a "See also" section with wikilink to organ builder list, and a few minor wikilinks. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 23:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
