Talk:History of the National Hockey League (1992–2017)

GA concerns

After reviewing this article, I am concerned that this article no longer meets the GA criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

• While this article states that it is about the history from 1992-2017, there is little post-2013 inforamtion.
• WP:LEADLENGTH recommends 4 paragraphs maximum for the lead, but this article has 5.
• There is uncited text throughout the article, including the entirety of the "Penguins, Blackhawks and Kings dominate" section.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Z1720 (talk) 22:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

History of the National Hockey League (1992–2017)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

There is little post-2013 information in the article. There is uncited text, including entire sections. The lead, at 5 paragraphs, is more than what is recommended at WP:LEADLENGTH. Z1720 (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

I shall return from my break momentarily to fix the lack of citations absent throughout the article. Please allow me some time to gather them. I won't be able to help with the lede nor the lack of content in the shootout era. Perhaps another editor would be willing to crack at that. Conyo14 (talk) 05:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm willing to help trim the lede. As for post-2013 - the article notes cup winners and notable outdoor games, as well as some tourneys. I'll add a little blurb on future award winners' debuts, perhaps, but besides that I'm not sure there's much we realistically can add that's not unnecessary bloat. The Kip ^(contribs) 21:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

@Z1720: I believe the uncited sections are now complete. Please let me know if there is more on that front that needs to be addrssed. Conyo14 (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

• @Conyo14: I added a cn tag. I do think the article needs more post-2012/13 lockout information. What were the ramifications of the lockout in terms of finances? What rule changes appeared because of the collective bargaining agreement? The article focuses a lot on the earlier years of this article's scope but neglects post 2012-ish, in my opinion. Z1720 (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

  Fixed the cn tag. Conyo14 (talk) 03:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

  I fixed spacing. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 19:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to see how the article holds up in terms of what has been accomplished in the GAR. I've trimmed the lede, added more fluff to the 2012–13 lockout, and included a section about the realignment and further expansion talks. Citations have been fixed throughout the article. Is there more to add on? Conyo14 (talk) 22:13, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I added a sentence and paragraph about loss of revenue, and the bounce-back after the lockout. I don't know of rule changes due to the CBA change. Alaney2k (talk) 18:35, 20 August 2024 ::*I feel very confident about a Keep Cos ^{(X + Z)} 15:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

• • Opinions Z1720? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• I added a cn tag. After that is resolved it should be OK to keep. Z1720 (talk) 00:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

• Resolved. Conyo14 (talk) 01:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

(UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.