Talk:Historia narodu polskiego

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Poland

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Historia narodu polskiego appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Historia narodu polskiego, the first modern history of Poland, was never finished but was highly influential on emerging Polish historiography?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Historia narodu polskiego.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Historia narodu polskiego, the first modern history of Poland, was never finished, but was highly influential on the emerging Polish historiography? Source: see 1:26, 33 for influential, unfinished is self-evident and also referenced in text
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bettie Freshwater Pool

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 11:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I will undertake this review. Cavalryman (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough and long enough.

I assess all of the article’s sources to be reliable and the article to written from a neutral POV. The article cites John D. Stanley quite extensively, I have read pages 23–27 which were available in the google books preview and see no plagiarism or close paraphrasing, and so I AGF with the other pages. Earwig shows no match whatsoever. It would be better to see another source cited for the basic information and Stanley for the detail as much of the basic subject matter is verifiable (example tertiary source). I cannot read the other two cited sources but AGF.

Hook is interesting and cited to Stanley.

Nice article which I enjoyed reading, thanks Piotrus Cavalryman (talk) 02:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]