Talk:Hayao Miyazaki bibliography

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:07, December 21, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Anime and manga: Studio Ghibli Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Studio Ghibli work group.

Animation: Asian Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Asian animation work group.

About this article's scope

Thanks for creating this article, Rhain! After a bit more thought into it, I felt that we should discuss the scope of this article. Since I'm unfamiliar with bibliography articles, I took a look at Category:Bibliographies by writer for a few more examples, and it seems to be more common for these to be in more straightforward list formats, with notable individual works linked to their own articles. I'm not saying it has to be that way, and I would normally fully support merging content upstream into a larger article if it would eliminate several dead-end stubs, which are unhelpful to everyone. In this case, however, several of these books (Miyazaki's two books and McCarthy, at least, which were also on my list to write about) should have enough content about them to fill out decently well-developed articles on their own merits. I wouldn't want to just split out Miyazakiworld without doing the rest of them, though, so I'd love to hear your thoughts about this. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69: Appreciate the message! I looked at a lot of bibliography articles before writing this one and decided this was the best format, partially inspired by Elizabeth David's; as you said, I'd rather have one larger article than multiple stubs. I considered separate articles for some, but felt Miyazakiworld was the only one that could really justify it at a decent length. That being said, you're more than welcome to take a shot at Miyazaki's and McCarthy's books (even in draftspace). There's no reason this article can't still exist even if those are split—all we'd have to do is trim the sections here summary style. The same goes for Miyazakiworld, of course. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I don't mind taking a crack at that sometime in the future; it's not currently a very high priority among the other projects I'm working on, but it's on the to-do list. I'll keep you updated in case I make any breaking changes to this article. Hope you've been doing well, by the way! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good; looking forward to it! I have faith that all of your edits will be great anyway—regardless, the only major edits to this article would likely be adding new entries or splitting sections summary style, so nothing to be concerned about. I hope you've been well too! I look forward to crossing paths more as we both continue working in this space—I only wish I could continue working on major projects more frequently. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 04:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]