This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
The Peacock tag placed without consultation on this article that I created is offensive. Anyone who bothers to check the citations will see that my summary of what they say is accurate. Moreover, this is the consensus view of Harry C. Hindmarsh who died 66 years ago. I have contributed to Wikipedia for 15 years, but lately, I find that instead of offering constructive criticism, editors denigrate what volunteers like me contribute. This is especially true of new entries. Instead of checking the citations, which requires work, they add standard tags that undermine the article's credibility. Again, they base their judgment solely on words and not on what the citations actually say. I agree with the guidance offered at Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View, i.e. "NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia projects. It is also one of Wikipedia's three core content policies; the other two are "Verifiability" and "No original research". These policies jointly determine the type and quality of material acceptable in Wikipedia articles, and because they work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another." Unfortunately, the "Verifiability" core content policy was not taken into consideration in this case. Hindmarsh was a Canadian newspaper executive who used sensationalism to build circulation. In this way, he mirrors the methods used by William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, but he added a distinctively Canadian twist, popular campaigns to promote government social programs. Bwark (talk) 00:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
