Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song)/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Royiswariii Talk! 03:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Lililolol (talk · contribs) 18:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Royiswariii (talk · contribs) 12:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	the phrase Meanwhile, 'On the Ground' peaked... could rephrase and clearer flow. In, Welxer explained that he was it 'intimidated at first', because.... the comma should be inside the quotation marks. The sentence The city pop-esque is built around soft piano... could a little bit confusing, please rephrase for clarification. Done Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	per 1a comment. Done Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	looks good.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	looks good.
	2c. it contains no original research.	looks good.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	there is a little copyvio detected by Earwig's, about 26.5%. Although, it wasn't concerning but I'm recommend to change a little bit too, target: 15% below. Check it on Copyright vio detector. Done Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	In, ...it turned out better than he could have ever imagined" and "Generally, it's never as good as it was in your head, [but] this was an exception. Although looks like a quote but you need too be neutral tone or if you want to keep it, add a quote box and add a summary on the quote.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Where's the album cover? add a non-free album cover. There is no other cover so considered as passed. Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Hold this until Lililolol addresses all what i suggested or Recommended. Royiswariii Talk! 15:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC) (GA Reviewer)[reply] Done Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii everything is finished except for the album cover. Since the song isn’t a single, it doesn’t have its own cover. Lililolol (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lililolol, you might want to ask for a second opinion on this review, as the reviewer has been indefinitely blocked for account sharing. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lililolol!

I'm apologize for taking too long on this but I will review again if have a changes. Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 02:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reviewer Comment: Hello again,Lililolol! I checked all what the changes and it appears all my suggestions and recommendations has completed, This article are now on Good Article. You may now nominate this on DYK or if you want to higher, go on FA. But I recommend to more expanded this on peer review. If you are not statisfied on this review, you can reassessment on this review. Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 03:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.