Jump to content

Talk:Hampton-on-Sea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Hampton-on-Sea 007.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Hampton-on-Sea 007.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hampton-on-Sea 007.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hampton-on-Sea. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hampton-on-Sea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drowned or submerged or something else

[edit]

Should the lead say drowned or submerged? The Oxford English dictionary says the meaning for drowned is submerge or flood (an area) i.e. "when the ice melted the valleys were drowned" however this is not a common term in British English, in fact drowned is normally related to deliberately kill (a person or animal) by drowning as per the Oxford English dictionary. User:Storye Book says in his reversal of my change to submerge that "Drowned" implies destruction, because the houses were completely demolished. However drowned does not mean this, as per the Oxford Dictionary description. So should the lead say something else? Davidstewartharvey (talk) 15:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English is a complex and subtle language, and always depends on context. Dictionaries may assist, particularly in scientific and legal matters, where certain words have precise meanings in those contexts. So let's think about the context. Submerging simply means the act of putting something in water such that it is entirely covered. That did not happen with the houses in the article; they were demolished before the sea completely flooded the area in which they stood. The fact of the settlement - i.e. the site, the buildings, the people, the life that went on there - was drowned, i.e. all life was taken away from it by the water. "When the ice melted the valleys were drowned" is a common enough expression for English speakers to understand. To drown, in many contexts, is to destroy, as in "drown one's sorrows in drink". The primary scientific meaning of "drown" is the manner of death by water as used by coroners, but the word can be used in many other ways. The difference remains, though: drowning is destructive. Submerging just means going underwater, like free divers. You can say that a free diver submerged and then drowned due to an additional event or circumstance, but submerging in itself is not destructive. If we used "submerged" in the header, it would mislead the reader into thinking that the buildings were still there. Storye book (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]