Talk:Hamilton Fish Park

Hamilton Fish Park has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 10, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Hamilton Fish Park appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Hamilton Fish Park, whose pool was used for Olympic practice, was one of the New York City Parks Department's "worst problem areas" by the 1970s?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hamilton Fish Park.

Wikipedia

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 07:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Hamilton Fish Park's opening was delayed by one week because New York City's parks commissioner objected to the cost and the park's features? Source: "Mr. Clausen Indignant.; Postpones Opening of Hamilton Fish Park and Criticises Predecessor". The New York Times. May 24, 1900. p. 14.
- ALT1:... that New York City's Hamilton Fish Park was rebuilt three years after its opening due to "the strenuous nature of the youth" of the Lower East Side neighborhood? Source: Sklar, Barbara (December 21, 1982). "Hamilton Fish Park Play Center". New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. p. 7.
- ALT2:... that Hamilton Fish Park, whose pool was used for Olympic practice, was one of the New York City Parks Department's "worst problem areas" by the 1970s? Source: (1) Mendelsohn, Joyce (2009). The Lower East Side Remembered and Revisited: A History and Guide to a Legendary New York Neighborhood. Columbia University Press. p. 224. (2) Perlmutter, Emanuel (July 24, 1973). "Boy, 16, Is Slain for $1 While on Park Pool Job". The New York Times.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Waller Plan
Comment: More hooks coming later

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 00:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Article is over 1500 words and meets expansion requirements. Body text is sourced aptly and the sources seem to be reliable. I will have to assume good faith on the ones where paid registration is required. I found no copyright violations and the writing is neutral. lullabying (talk) 00:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hamilton Fish Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Short description goes at the top.
Add alt text to every image being used.
"restored again" → "restored"
"facades made" → "facades are made"
Remove the comma after "pool entrances".
"mayor Robert" → "Mayor Robert"
"bee reopened" - typo?
"a NYC Parks" → "an NYC Parks"
"wading pool; and" → "wading pool, and"
"at a cost of" → "for" (less wordy)
"New York City, it was" → "New York City, was"
Wikilink Edith Evans Asbury and Amy Sohn.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I've fixed all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 04:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]