Talk:HMS Seahorse (1794)

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Seahorse wrecked of Tramore, Ireland in 1816

The Sea Horse, a sailing transport ship, made her last voyage from Ramsgate in England to Cork in Ireland with 16 officers and 287 soldiers of the 59th Regiment, together with 33 women and 38 children on board when she was wrecked off Tramore in a violent storm. Could this vessel have been the seahorse built in 1794? What evidence is there that she was broken up in July 1819? Shipsview (talk) 19:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am informed that The Seahorse I am seeking was not a Frigate as some modern writers have indicated. She was/had:

280 tons (Thomas Redding, a crew member)

360 tons (Lieutenant Henry Hartford, army officer, a survivor)

350 tons (Lieutenant A McPherson, army officer, a survivor)

350 tons (Colonel McGregor, brother of an officer who perished)

3 masts, foremast, main mast and a mizzen mast (therefore, a barque and not a brig (a 2 mast vessel)

Quarter deck

Quarter deck boats, attached to the mizzen mast.

There is mention of “between decks” so she had probably two, if not three decks.

She must have been between 110 and 150 feet in length to accommodate nearly 400 people though they were in cramped conditions.

Shipsview (talk) 11:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in HMS Seahorse (1794)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of HMS Seahorse (1794)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Winfield":

From French frigate Armide (1804): Winfield (2008), pp.177-8.
From HMS Active (1799): Winfield (2008), p.151-2.
From HMS Cydnus (1813): Winfield (2008), p.186.
From Dutch brig Komeet (1789): Winfield (2008), p.279-90.
From HMS Unicorn (1794): Winfield (2008), p. 142.
From HMS Sophie (1809): Winfield. British Warships of the Age of Sail. p. 285.
From French frigate Sensible (1788): Winfield (2008), p.206-7.
From HMS Pactolus (1813): Winfield (2008), pp.186-7.
From HMS Bonne Citoyenne (1796): Winfield (2008), pp.232-3.
From HMS Childers (1778): Winfield (2008), p.275.
From HMS Aetna (1803): Winfield (2008), p.374.
From HMS Melampus (1785): Winfield (2008), 140-1.
From HMS Erebus (1807): Winfield (2008), p.381.
From HMS Fairy (1812): Winfield (2008), p.301.
From HMS Pomone (1805): Winfield (2008), p. 165.
From HMS Wolverine (1798): Winfield (2008), p.292.
From HMS Euryalus (1803): Winfield (2008), p.155-6.
From HMS Manly (1812): Winfield (2008), p.345.
From HMS Cerberus (1794): Winfield (2008), pp.145-6.
From HMS Swiftsure (1787): Winfield. British Warships. Chap. 3, p. 76. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |nopp= ignored (|no-pp= suggested) (help)
From HMS Alcmene (1794): Winfield. British Warships of the Age of Sail. p. 135.
From HMS Starr (1805): Winfield (2008), 259.
From Dutch corvette Scipio (1784): Winfield (2008), p.273.
From HMS Tonnant (1798): Winfield (2008), p.33.
From HMS Dryad (1795): Winfield (2008), p.146.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Seahorse (1794). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306204735/http://www.servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr/contenu/functions/dc/attached/FRSHD_PUB_00000226_dc/FRSHD_PUB_00000226_dc_att-FRSHD_PUB_00000226_01.pdf to http://www.servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr/contenu/functions/dc/attached/FRSHD_PUB_00000226_dc/FRSHD_PUB_00000226_dc_att-FRSHD_PUB_00000226_01.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]