Jump to content

Talk:HMS Assurance (1780)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Assurance (1780)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 01:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Images appropriately licensed
  • Link sister ship in the caption
  • Done.
  • Link launched in the lede, add link to ship class on first use
  • Added link, I think the ship class is already linked where necessary
  • Delete the inflation calculators; warships are capital costs, not consumer goods. 3 million pounds today might outfit a modern warships boats, but it's hugely wrong
  • Done.
  • Change the link for long gun to naval long gun
  • Done.
  • Clarify that these are smoothbores
  • Done.
  • Her name was a historical one of Royal Navy use, originating in 1605 awkward
  • Rephrased.
  • Fix the link to St Augustine
  • Oops! Done.
  • Clarify that the 1793 refit was to restore her as a frigate, not as a troopship
  • Done.

@Sturmvogel 66: Thanks again! My responses are above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]