Talk:HAL Tejas Mk2

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 25 September 2019 by reviewer Bkissin (talk · contribs).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Indian / South Asia / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Requested move 15 November 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Please feel free to initiate a new request if it becomes clear that common usage in independent, reliable sources has changed. Dekimasuよ! 07:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tejas Mk2 → HAL Medium Weight Fighter – For naming precision as per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. Tejas-MK2 has been rechristened "Medium Weight Fighter" after going through significant design changes through the years. It is now a completely different design, much in the same way Su-35 is different from Su-27. — Vaibhavafro ^💬 07:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC) —Relisting. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 07:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Your cited source says "India is redesignating the Mark-2 upgrade of the homegrown Tejas aircraft as a medium weight fighter due to its increased weight and weapon carrying capacity." How is this a rechristening? Dicklyon (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Dicklyon, See the second external link up there.— Vaibhavafro ^💬 19:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sounds more like a trial balloon than a name that's likely to catch on. Shouldn't we wait and see? Dicklyon (talk) 04:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Fair enough. Let's wait and watch.— Vaibhavafro ^💬 08:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for this new article, but note that other editors have called for it to be merged to HAL Tejas due to the similarity of the topics..

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

MWF line-drawing & payload.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

MWF cockpit mockup at Defexpo.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

MWF line-drawing & payload.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

MWF cockpit mockup at Defexpo.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Move 08 May 2021

requesting a minor title change from HAL Tejas 'Mk2' to simply HAL Tejas MK2 or HAL Tejas Mark 2, as that's how it is mentioned in official records.^[1]^[2]--E1Char (talk) 04:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Max Speed

The claim that max speed is at sea level is unsourced and since it's common practice that aircraft max speed is at altitude unless sea level is specified, it's the unsourced claim that it's at sea level that needs to be verified since it deviates from common practice not the other way around.919181512a (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to type that Mach 1.8 at sea level would make it the fastest fighter jet in the world.

Here are some Mach speeds at sea level for common jets: F-15 M1.2, MIG-31 M1.21, F-16 M1.2, Rafale M1.1, Typhoon M1.25, Gripen M1.2, SU-35 M1.13, F-22 M1.21 919181512a (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Care to cite reliable sources? So far, you have only provided original research. - ZLEA _T\^C 21:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article would only need a source for speed at sea level if it actually stated a speed at sea level. The article doesn't claim a maximum speed of Mach 1.8 (or any other value) at sea level. The words "Sea level" do not appear in the article, so I don't know where this comment comes from.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your right it doesn't claim sea level but the unsourced converted speed (max speed kmh) 2385km/h does indicate a convert at sea level or actually it's greater than M1.8 at sea level.

Maximum speed is maximum speed and since these kind of jets fly faster at altitude max speed is at altitude unless sea level is specifically specified.

That is why i removed max_speed_kmh and used cvt to calculate the convert speed at altitude from the sourced M1.8 value.

I used max altitude as it is common to do so, at higher altitudes the speed doesn't change much if i use 10000 meters instead of 15240m in the convert the difference in max speed will only be 10km/h.

I looked at the history of the article to trace the origin of the 2385km/h value and it is an convert from an older max speed value of M2.0

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HAL_Tejas_Mk2&diff=prev&oldid=1043266652

It got moved to max_speed_km

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HAL_Tejas_Mk2&diff=prev&oldid=1043328947

The Mach value got updated to M1.8 but no one updated the max_speed_km and it has been wrong ever since.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HAL_Tejas_Mk2&diff=prev&oldid=1062122191

I also looked for the origin of the older M2.0 value and it was an unsourced change from M1.8

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HAL_Tejas_Mk2&diff=prev&oldid=969149118

The origin of the value for max_speed_km is known and it's also known that it's wrong according to the sourced value of Mach 1.8 so maybe we should revert back to my edit that actually converts the sourced value at altitude.

Using convert might prevent this error from repeating itself since the Mach value and cvt is in the same parameter. 919181512a (talk) 01:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the unsourced max speed. I've removed it for now. As for converting it to km/h, I think it would be best to wait until reliable sources start giving the max speed in more precise units. - ZLEA _T\^C 04:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] "Aeronautical Development Agency".

[2] "DRDO".

[1]

[2]