Talk:Gummy Song Fetus

File:Gummy Song Fetus.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Gummy Song Fetus.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Gummy Song Fetus.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:31, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

The entire "Tracklist Summary" reads like one big advertisement, with the promotional tone, buzzwords and everything. Please review WP:NPOV. :) Salvidrim! 05:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to the Gummy Song Fetus page have been made. I believe they meet Wikipedia standards now. TheMikeBlackSpecial (talk) 17:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. You're expressing a judgement on the songs (calling them nostalgic, etc.). That's WP:OR; if sources describe them as such, then the situation is different. But still, using those buzzwords (quasi-bluegrass, psychedelic drone, organ fuzz) is highly frowned upon. This is not a promotional flyer nor a press release. Salvidrim! 18:00, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, revisions failed, so section deleted. I just felt the genre/style of songs would be not only relevant but desirable to readers who even come across this tiny page. TheMikeBlackSpecial (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]