Jump to content

Talk:Gravity Bone/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Torchiest (talk · contribs) 21:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this over the next few days. —Torchiest talkedits 21:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yay thank you. — ΛΧΣ21 21:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Before I give a full review, something that I immediately noticed is that the sequel section is very small, and the Thirty Flights of Loving link just points back to that section. Since there's no article for that game, can you add more details about it? You tell us how the game was funded and something about its music, but nothing about its plot or gameplay. —Torchiest talkedits 23:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This is generally pretty good; there are a few points to fix before it can pass though.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    I copy edited the article and fixed all the prose problems.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    My only problem is that in the development section, you use just one source for the entire thing. Can you find any other sources talking about development?
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    As I said above, I'd like to see a little more explanation of the sequel. I also think you need to describe the game's plot, which can probably fit in the gameplay section rather than getting its own, since the game is so short.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    The screenshot source should not be "myself". I think you should change it to say something like "screen capture from the video game".
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This pretty close, and if you can add another development source, fix the image NFUR, and give more info on the sequel and plot, I think this will be good to go. Until then, it is on hold. —Torchiest talkedits 04:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Yay. Well, the game has not a big plot. Its sjut about a spy who has to do missions and nothing else. Nothing complex. let me see if I can add a bit of that. I will do the sequel expansion too. Sadly, I had a rough time finding that dev source; I feel there won't be any other. I will take a look, however. Thank you Torchiest. — ΛΧΣ21 23:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, I know it has very little plot, but you can describe the events, like, you poison a drink, you shoot some birds, you chase someone at the end, etc. If you can't find another source for development, that's okay, but yeah see what you can do. Cheers. —Torchiest talkedits 00:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pass. Congratulations. :) —Torchiest talkedits 18:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! After months of work it got passed :D — ΛΧΣ21 18:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]