Talk:Grant McCracken

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 7 July 2021 by Altamel.

GrantMcCracken (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

MaryGaulke (talk · contribs) has been paid by Grant McCracken. Disclosures made below and on userpage.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grant McCracken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140228033147/http://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/grant-mccracken-phd to http://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/grant-mccracken-phd

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI edit request

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hi! Grant McCracken has hired me to make a quick edit request for this article: removing {{COI}} from the top. This template was placed by retired user Justeditingtoday more than four years ago, presumably in response to GrantMcCracken editing the article. Since then, he has not been involved in editing this article, nor does he intend to in the future now that he understands Wikipedia's guidelines. According to the Who Wrote That? browser extension, GrantMcCracken has written only 4.6% of the current article. The only part of the article I think could be construed as non-NPOV is the assertion that he coined the term "Diderot effect", since no source is provided. Here's one source to fill that gap: Lorenzen, Janet A. (2015). "Diderot Effect". The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Consumption and Consumer Studies. p. 1. doi:10.1002/9781118989463.wbeccs095. ISBN 9781118989463. Lots of other sources are also available.

Let me know if there's anything else I should provide to justify removing {{COI}} from this article. Thanks! Mary Gaulke (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The COI tag is gratuitous for an article of this short length, lacking any visible signs of bias. I would hardly have expected the article to look different even if it had been entirely written by unconflicted editors. Only issue I spotted is that Twitter link should be removed, because Grant McCracken's blog already has a feed embedded. See WP:ELMIN.

MaryGaulke, there is one more thing you can do to help. Please fill out the {{Connected contributor}} tag for McCracken and put it at the top of this page. Thank you. Altamel (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to – done! Thanks much. Mary Gaulke (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]