Talk:Good Energy

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Corporate Guff

Stop taking out my cited material and replacing it with corporate guff from GE's annual report, please. Famousdog 13:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, the ISP address 217.169.17.109 is registered as belonging to Unit(e), a green energy supplier that appears to have changed its name to... well, well, lookee here... Good Energy. Edits by this ISP address should be viewed with skepticism. Famousdog 21:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations/References

Why are references to blogs regarded universally by Famousdog as 'unreliable sources'? A BBC 'blog' that covers a news programme is rather different to a random anonymous blog? --Kjw (talk) 12:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category?

Do Good Energy actually generate any electricity? I was under the impression that they bought and sold it, making them a supplier, not a generator... Vanky 07:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think they're principally a supplier - is there a supplier category? The Land 21:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They own Delabole, 10 turbines, total max capacity 4MW. Kjw 11:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re-power this asset

What on earth does "plans to re-power this asset in late 2009" mean? Sounds like internal management speak.

--Rjmunro (talk) 23:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some digging, they mean replace the old turbines with some new ones, I have changed article accordinglyBack ache (talk) 13:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Good Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070711065425/http://www.aecb.net/PDFs/green%20electricity%20illusion.pdf to http://www.aecb.net/PDFs/green%20electricity%20illusion.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Good Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Good Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism invalid

The quote from The Ecologist (reference 40) falls for the common fallacy that the mix from the grid is immutable. However, it is immediately affected by what goes in (they even say so later in the paragraph). If I pay twenty bucks into your bank account on your birthday and you withdraw twenty, you don’t get the same notes. The ones you get could have been paid in by a hoodlum who mugged a pensioner. But it’s still a present from me. Same with electrons. It should be noted that this criticism is invalid. Freddie Orrell (talk) 06:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]