Talk:GoodBarber

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

underlinked

Hi there, it seems like this page is being marked as underlinked when it seems to be linked quite well.

I made a few recent edits and removed the template, my edit changes are explained below:

"Removed the underlinked template, I feel is I have adequately reviewed every relevant link, and given the number of links added by other editors this template does not seem to make sense. I was also able to fill in the full names of two of the associates who were involved with founding the company, and managed to find another source which is relevant to both the full name of the individual and GoodBraber!"

Please let me know if you feel this is wrong, and if so why!

Thanks so much, L.E. Rainer 17:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]