Jump to content

Talk:Global strategic petroleum reserves

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Iran

[edit]

Does Iran have a strategic petroleum reserve?Patchouli 15:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen nothing on Iran or any other oil-exporting country having a SPR. Usually, the oil-exporting countries don't need a SPR since they have enough already on hand to handle any supply disruptions from either their commercial oil companies or their government oil companies. So I guess you could say they have an informal SPR of whatever oil is being readied for export--in an emergency the respective government could just stop exporting and use their domestic stock.Publicus 14:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

I added the cleanup-references tag to flag the following recommendations:

  • Converting inline external links to Wikipedia:Footnotes using the <ref> tag mechanism.
  • I assume some of the sites mentioned in "External links" document some of the otherwise unreferenced claims in the article. It's important to match up claims and sources so readers can easily find out exactly where a particular fact is coming from.

-- Beland 20:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beland, when you have a chance can you check out the references again. I tried to clean them up. Thanks. Publicus 20:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure...I've marked specific claims that don't have any footnotes pointing to a source. Some of these are the same as I've previously marked and I'm not sure why these marks were removed. If these sources are already on the page, there should be multiple footnotes pointing to the same note. Many of the claims are also non-specific with regard to date. There should be an "as of ____" for each size claim. Time words like "recently" (as in the line about Thailand's reserve) are not useful because we don't know when that part of the article was last updated. That should just mention a specific date instead, which we could look up if we knew the source for this claim. -- Beland 21:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reserves or inventory?

[edit]

I guess the fact that the article links to oil reserves is an obvious misunderstanding. SPR is an oil inventory, rahter then oil reserve, which has a different meaning (nicely dicribed in the linked article about oil reserves). I am correcting this. Insert non-formatted text here

Why all in the South?

[edit]

Does anyone know why all of the US reserves are in sites in the Southern states? It isn't that important, but it would surely make more sense to spread them out around the country...

WikiReaderer 18:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason for the US SPR reserve location has to do with the port of Houston and the surrounding refinery facilities. That's where all the commercial oil is so that's where the US placed their SPR. This is kind of standard practice for most SPRs, usually they're located very close to commercial facilities. Publicus 22:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the salt domes that contain much of the reserve were already conveniently available. Cheers Geologyguy 00:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]

I reassessed this article to 'C' as it has improved significantly. However, there are still some issues. The articles as a number of references but additional references are needed. There are several paragraphs without any reference. Also, references should be formatted to apply the same style.

I am not sure about the structure. Of course, it is useful to have a country specific information, but you may fall in the trap of long and out of hands by-country list. This should be reconsidered and maybe some of the country-specific subsections could be merged and better summarized. Also, there are more emergency oil sharing agreements than only these three, so again, maybe merger and expansion would improve its coverage. Beagel (talk) 08:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Beagel, good suggestions. Publicus 22:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Switzerland.

[edit]

Can someone please expand why (as stated in article) Hurricane Katrina led to the 1st use of Swiss SPR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.53.15.195 (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the updated source. After Katrina all the IEA members released some of their stocks. Publicus 15:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=60953
    Triggered by \biranmania\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Global strategic petroleum reserves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Global strategic petroleum reserves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Global strategic petroleum reserves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Global strategic petroleum reserves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]