Talk:Gita Dhyanam
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gita Dhyanam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Gita Dhyanam appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article rating
[edit]Here is text copied from a recent query about the article rating (for Project India):
- Hello, thanks for your rating of Gita Dhyanam at its talk page. If you would be so kind, to facilitate article improvement, please indicate on the talk page what elements of a "C class" article you believe the present article lacks. Many thansk -- Presearch (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- I will if I have time, if you believe it meets C class or higher, please feel free to upgrade the status. I simply put down start class for...well...starters. LOL. I didn't by any stretch, give it a massive comprehensive review. Take care. Sorry about deleting the link, as you pointed out, it's relevant.TheRingess (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- No problem! Thanks for your quick response. Best -- Presearch (talk) 00:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- I will if I have time, if you believe it meets C class or higher, please feel free to upgrade the status. I simply put down start class for...well...starters. LOL. I didn't by any stretch, give it a massive comprehensive review. Take care. Sorry about deleting the link, as you pointed out, it's relevant.TheRingess (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for your rating of Gita Dhyanam at its talk page. If you would be so kind, to facilitate article improvement, please indicate on the talk page what elements of a "C class" article you believe the present article lacks. Many thansk -- Presearch (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Based on the above interchange, I expect in the next day or two to 1) insert a sentence or two in lede to reflect additional sections of article body; 2) Upgrade rating to "C class" unless someone points out additional improvements needed for C-class. -- Presearch (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)