Talk:Geraldine L. Richmond

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geraldine L. Richmond article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Women in Red: Celebrating Women Scientists (2016)

This article was created or improved during the Celebrating Women Scientists edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in 2016. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Translation

Page created mostly from German wikipedia. ServiceAT (talk) 15:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy on date of National Medal of Science

There is a discrepancy in the date of Richmond's National Medal of Science, which according to sources was announced in December 2015 to be awarded in January 2016, then delayed until May 2016. The official NMSTF website, however, gives the date of her medal as 2013. I sent an e-mail to the site administrator with that question and another about whether the photos on the site are in the public domain, and received the following reply:

From: laura@nationalmedals.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM Subject: Re: Date error
The official years for the medals are based off the year the recipient was nominated for the award, not the year it was presented. As you can see, the process is a few years behind. The committees and various working groups are working hard to get all caught up!
On a similar note, the “age awarded” goes by the nomination year, as opposed to the actual date of the ceremony, as well.
The image of Geri and President Obama on our website is public domain, and you are welcome to download it directly from the site.. We ask that you give credit to Ryan K. Morris Photography and the NSTMF.
I hope this helps clear up the confusion (particularly about the year/date situation), and feel free to reach out if you need anything else!
Thanks, National Science & Technology Medals Foundation www.nationalmedals.org

I have thus revised the medal date in the list of her honors; I'm in process of uploading PD image. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:OTRS. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Research section

I tagged the Research section for lack of citations and for overly technical language. I did attempt to find references to the kinds of research that are presented in bullet points, but I lack the technical expertise to even formulate a Boolean search on any of the topics listed. The research section could benefit from Wikipedia's suggestions on avoiding overly technical language. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 01:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another observation: parts of this section are written in first person plural, rather than treating the subject's research in third person singular (or plural, if the research is done by students or other associates in the lab). The first person voice does not reflect an encyclopedic tone... at the very least, this section needs to be re-written from the point of view of a disinterested observer. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 07:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the section, for now, as it was uncited. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some neutral comments on her research based on her highly cited papers, inspired in part by the removed section. :) EdChem (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]