Jump to content

Talk:George Schollenberger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 17:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/George Schollenberger; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:George Schollenberger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 23:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 21:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Image review: The image is acceptable fair use. I did uncover his senior yearbook picture from the 1930 Temple yearbook, but haven't been able to determine the copyright status of it. Not really worth pushing unless you want me to research the matter further (the yearbook does notate a copyright on it but I haven't done a copyright office check or anything like that), but since that will be public domain in 14 months regardless of status it might be worth putting in the back of your mind for when that time comes. Wizardman 00:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see any issues on the prose front. Source review to follow shortly. Wizardman 02:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checked all sources except for source #2 and I don't see any copyright issues, nor anything that isn't properly handled by the sources. Also did a newspapers.com double check and didn't see anything missing. Found a couple good sources but they ended up being for a different George Schollenberger. Since I can't think of anything else to add I'll pass this. Wizardman 15:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]